On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:08 AM, /#!/JoePea wrote:
> > I really believe that we should be allowed to name our elements with any
> > name we wish, and that they should override native elements (that
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:08 AM, /#!/JoePea wrote:
> I really believe that we should be allowed to name our elements with any
> name we wish, and that they should override native elements (that is future
> proof), and that overriding should be on some type of encapsulated basis
Thanks for the link!
I really believe that we should be allowed to name our elements with any
name we wish, and that they should override native elements (that is future
proof), and that overriding should be on some type of encapsulated basis
(for example, override within a shadow root and it