Re: Push API draft update

2012-08-28 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:00:11 +0300, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Art, Can you update the Webapps Publication Status page to add Eduardo as co-editor of the Push API draft? Done - you should be able to do it yourselves actually, using your normal W3C login credentials. We

Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 28

2012-08-21 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:20:34 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so. I

Re: [widgets] PC ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8

2012-08-20 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:46:00 +0200, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote: On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote: On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com (mailto:art.bars

Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a window.CSS global?

2012-08-19 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:03:19 +0200, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote: Chaals McCathieNevile: Frankly, I am deeply sceptical that the CSS group has managed to solve the social problem sufficiently well to make the technical solution noticeably different from hasFeature. I think

Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-16 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:06 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote: That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just encourage people to listen to

Re: Web Components Suggestion

2012-08-13 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:47:22 +0200, Florian Bösch pya...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Michael[tm] Smith m...@w3.org wrote: There is no conceivable conformance checker that's going to allow the use of completely arbitrary tag names. It doesn't matter what formalism it

Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8

2012-08-09 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
recommendation is we start a new CfC. Works for me. Marcos, should I just send you a snippet for references? cheers -Thanks, AB On 7/26/12 9:52 AM, ext Chaals McCathieNevile wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:17:42 +0200, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote: On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 at 19:02

Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB

2012-08-09 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:53:06 +0200, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote: On Aug 9, 2012, at 02:28 , Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 8/8/12 8:23 PM, Adam Barth wrote: If we're telling people to use that pattern, we might as well just not prefix the API in the first place because that pattern just

Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8

2012-07-26 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:17:42 +0200, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote: On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 at 19:02, Chaals McCathieNevile wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote: Marcos would like to publish

Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8

2012-07-25 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.

Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification

2012-07-12 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:52:06 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Kornel Lesi�~Dski wrote: However, I'm afraid that the most common implementation (aside from complete lack of error recovery) will be a simple as 30-second retry interval and that won't be very DoS-safe.

change of affiliation

2012-06-30 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
Hi all, after today I will no longer be working for Opera. I will remain chair of web-apps as an invited expert. After a break I will be working for Yandex, the Russian search and services company... cheers Chaals -- Chaals - standards declaimer