Re: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications

2015-03-24 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
As far as I know, you can watch individual issues with GitHub, so you could create a GitHub account with that email address and then watch relevant issues. Also it would mean that an email would be sent if someone mentioned the user (ie @www-international) in any issue Kenneth On Tue, Mar 24,

Re: [manifest] RE: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5

2015-03-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi Claes, The web app manifest spec allows extensions (it has extension points), so we would expect the Permissions WG/CG to come up with a proper way to deal with permissions. If they come to the conclusion that we need some permission field in the manifest, their spec can add that. It is not

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-01-15 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Anne, maybe you could write on the wiki what the current Web Components implementation in Chrome is using. That would make it a bit easier to follow for people who didn't follow all of the discussion so far. Kenneth On Thu Jan 15 2015 at 5:05:35 PM Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-01-15 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Thanks, this is very useful! On Thu Jan 15 2015 at 5:40:02 PM Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote: Anne, maybe you could write on the wiki what the current Web Components implementation

Re: [screen-orientation] Remove the ability to lock to multiple orientations?

2014-03-14 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
I agree, and it was also a surprise to me when I first noticed that. I believe Wonsuk might know the history behind that decision. Kenneth On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, at 6:44, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: I am cc'ing

Re: [screen-orientation] Remove the ability to lock to multiple orientations?

2014-03-13 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
on mobile. [1] Very likely, any UA could simply re-write the mechanism that listen for device orientation changes and do manual screen locking based on that, though... [2] http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/widget/gonk/OrientationObserver.cpp -- Mounir -- Kenneth Rohde

Re: [manifest] Utility of bookmarking to home screen, was V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-17 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
[2] https://gist.github.com/marcoscaceres/9018819 -- Marcos Caceres -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆

Re: [screen-orientation] Locking to 'current' orientation

2013-12-03 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
actually force a particular orientation. -- Glenn Maynard -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆

Re: [screen-orientation] When window orientation != screen orientation...

2013-12-02 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
of existing Screen/Device related MQs. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/mediaqueries4/#mf-dimensions Kenneth -- Mounir -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆

Re: [manifest] orientation member

2013-12-02 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
orientations - hopefully the CSS Device Adaption spec can align with the Screen Orientation spec. Let's finish up the Screen Orientation spec first and then see how the same solution will fit with CSS Device Adaptation aka @viewport rule. Kenneth -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect

Re: [screen-orientation] Locking to 'current' orientation

2013-11-26 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
just fail, if it is not, it could lock immediately. It is no different from using the window.screen.orientation. Kenneth -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆

Re: [screen-orientation] screen orientation angle

2013-11-26 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
can be negative, which is a footgun and the having this value living in window and the rest in window.screen is odd -- Mounir -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆

Re: [screen-orientation] screen orientation angle

2013-11-26 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013, at 3:49, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: a) Will this be a delta from the current orientation? or relative to the default device orientation? I guess the former makes the most sense

Re: [screen-orientation] screen orientation angle

2013-11-26 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi, It seems a better option would be for the Device Orientation API to provide values relative to the current screen up direction. This could be optional if anyone can think of use cases where you both a) need absolute device orientation, and b) wouldn't have already locked the screen

Re: New manifest spec - ready for FPWD?

2013-11-26 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
app provides a native app UI but still requires the device to be online. Thanks, Alan [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-widgets-20121127/#configuration-document -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆

Re: Define window.orientation

2013-11-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Because it will be portrait or landscale and not numbers like 0, 90, ... which might start counting from portrait or landscape. Kenneth

Re: Define window.orientation

2013-11-05 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920342 As an aside, any chance we could have those two drafts be a single draft covering that whole spectrum? -- http://annevankesteren.nl/ -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆

Re: [screen-orientation] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-27 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
: On 10/26/13 9:03 AM, ext Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: Yes, Tizen and IE11 implements it Thanks Kenneth. Marcos - is the following what Mounir means re screen-orientation issues you raised: Yes. The TAG was supposed to expand on them, but hasn’t yet. Also, Mounir has addressed

Re: [screen-orientation] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-26 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Yes, Tizen and IE11 implements it Kenneth On Oct 25, 2013 5:30 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: On 10/2/13 12:31 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi Mounir, If any of the data for the Screen Orientation API in [PubStatus] is not accurate, please provide corrections. Also, if

Re: Polished FileSystem API proposal

2013-07-13 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi there! A new file system API with a lot of promise :-) On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: Hi All, Yesterday a few of us at mozilla went through the FileSystem API proposal we previously sent [1] and tightened it up. Executive Summary (aka TL;DR):

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-06-10 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi there, On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Lars Knudsen lar...@gmail.com wrote: IMO, this would be a much more clean and easy to understand solution than providing a separate API for orientation lock. It would also remove 1 unknown element when game developers try to juggle mappings between

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-06-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
these ambiguities, if we want mobile browsers to converge on a single behaviour. On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote: I think it should be. You think anything is missing? Kenneth On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Simon Pieters sim

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-06-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Kenneth On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote: As I understand it, the CSS specs never refer to device pixels, but always to CSS pixels which are basically your DIPs, so the confusion only arises from the fact that browsers did DPI adjustment

[css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API

2013-06-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
In order for CSS Device Adaptation and Fullscreen to work better together and work with orientation lock in fullscreen mode, I suggest (idea by Rune) we extend the view-mode media feature with the below syntax. I also suggest that we move the view-mode media feature into Media Queries Level 4.

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-06-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote: As I understand it, the CSS specs never refer to device pixels, but always to CSS pixels which are basically your DIPs, so the confusion only arises from the fact that browsers did DPI adjustment (upscaled

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-06-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
existence of device pixels should only be detectable using the device pixel ratio, which exposes the ratio between device pixels and DIPs, and things like CSS4 image-set). On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there On Thu, Jun

Re: [css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API

2013-06-06 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
that it is ignored for normal web navigation to avoid confusing the user. On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote: ... Is it accurate to tie this to @viewport? When I

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-06-05 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
I think it should be. You think anything is missing? Kenneth On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:00:48 +0200, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen kenneth.r.christiansen@intel.**com kenneth.r.christian...@intel.com wrote: I support adding

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-04-25 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi there, On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Tobie Langel to...@w3.org wrote: On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: Hi there, CSS Device Adaptation should hopefully be enabled on all browsers (desktop and mobile) unlike the viewport meta tag, which cannot

Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?

2013-04-24 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi there, CSS Device Adaptation should hopefully be enabled on all browsers (desktop and mobile) unlike the viewport meta tag, which cannot be enabled on desktop browsers easily as many desktop sites actually comes with a viewport meta tag which is ignored. Having that not being ignored breaks

CSS Device Adaption and Fullscreen

2012-02-07 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
the use-cases that web developers have. iframe going fullscreen could define a different viewport and maybe that is sufficient. Any thought about that? and could we add some clarification to the proper specs? -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Senior Engineer Nokia Mobile Phones, Browser / WebKit team

Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock

2012-01-31 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
. If someone can commit to being an Editor, please speak up. I could try that. -- Mounir -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Senior Engineer Nokia Mobile Phones, Browser / WebKit team Phone +45 4093 0598 / E-mail kenneth at webkit. http://gmail.comorg http://codeposts.blogspot.com ﹆﹆﹆

Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock

2012-01-30 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
steps up, I'll take the testing hat. WDYT? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Senior Engineer Nokia Mobile Phones, Browser / WebKit team Phone +45 4093 0598 / E-mail kenneth at webkit. http://gmail.comorg http://codeposts.blogspot.com ﹆﹆﹆

Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock

2012-01-30 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Hi there, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote: Hi, On Jan 30, 2012, at 12:43 , Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: Orientation lock is already part of the CSS Device Adaption spec as part of the viewport meta tag Sorry, I should indeed have mentioned

Re: CfC Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock

2012-01-30 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Senior Engineer Nokia Mobile Phones, Browser / WebKit team Phone +45 4093 0598 / E-mail kenneth at webkit. http://gmail.comorg http://codeposts.blogspot.com ﹆﹆﹆

Re: Charter addition proposal: screen orientation lock

2012-01-30 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
, but it would be great to cover as many use cases as possible early on, so that we don't end up patching things to work well together. Kenneth -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Senior Engineer Nokia Mobile Phones, Browser / WebKit team Phone +45 4093 0598 / E-mail kenneth at webkit. http

Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L?

2010-12-14 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
) binding -- for joy-filled extension and decoration DOM elements. Describing all these as just Binding just feels wrong. Web Components perhaps or something along these lines? Who's with me? :) :DG -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Senior Engineer Application and Service Frameworks, Nokia Danmark

Comments on View Modes

2010-04-01 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
modes. Cheers, -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Technical Lead / Senior Software Engineer Qt Labs Americas, Nokia Technology Institute, INdT Phone +55 81 8895 6002 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org http://codeposts.blogspot.com ﹆﹆﹆