Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-08-14 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Marcin Hanclikmarcin.hanc...@access-company.com wrote: Hi Marcos, Thanks for your comments. Which developers in particular did you have in mind? I meant developers who could develop widgets by hand, without any automation. (These may the same people as

RE: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-08-13 Thread Marcin Hanclik
: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 1:43 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; conno...@w3.org; public-...@w3.org Subject: Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI

Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-08-13 Thread Marcos Caceres
Marcin Hanclik wrote: Hi Marcos, Thanks for your comments. I think we should ask i18n for guidance. Let's ask them. To Step 7, I've added If doc is encoded in a format that is unsupported by the user agent, then the user agent must terminate this algorithm and treat this widget package

RE: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-08-13 Thread Marcin Hanclik
...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:00 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; conno...@w3.org; public-...@w3.org Subject: Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization On Tue

Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-08-07 Thread Marcos Caceres
2009/7/25 Marcin Hanclik marcin.hanc...@access-company.com: Hi Marcos, All, Regarding the usage of IRI in the widget configuration document, I do not know which speicification is responsible for mandating the IRI normalization. It is possible that I simply have not yet found the proper

Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-08-07 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Marcin Hanclikmarcin.hanc...@access-company.com wrote: Hi Marcos, Yeah, that seems reasonable. I've added it. I have not seen your change, I do not know where to look for it. See http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/Overview_TSE.html#iri-attribute Anyway, I

RE: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-07-28 Thread Marcin Hanclik
[mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 6:24 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; conno...@w3.org; public-...@w3.org Subject: Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization 2009/7/25 Marcin

Re: [PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-07-27 Thread Marcos Caceres
2009/7/25 Marcin Hanclik marcin.hanc...@access-company.com: Hi Marcos, All, Regarding the usage of IRI in the widget configuration document, I do not know which speicification is responsible for mandating the IRI normalization. It is possible that I simply have not yet found the proper

[PC] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization

2009-07-25 Thread Marcin Hanclik
Hi Marcos, All, Regarding the usage of IRI in the widget configuration document, I do not know which speicification is responsible for mandating the IRI normalization. It is possible that I simply have not yet found the proper existing explanation to the issue, so if you know it, I would be