Maciej Stachowiak:
> The name NativeObject seems nondescriptive and could easily be taken as
> the opposite of what it means. For example, in the browser context, code
> written in C++ is often called "native" but code written in JavaScript
> typically is not.
I can buy this confusion (although
]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:15 AM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: Cameron McCormack; Giovanni Campagna; Kruessel, Steffen; WebApps WG;
i...@hixie.ch
Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> What about [ESNativeObject]?
: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> What about [ESNativeObject]?
I don't think the property should be ES-specific. It would probably
have effects for other language bindings too. I'm also not sure this
clarifies the
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:
What about [ESNativeObject]?
I don't think the property should be ES-specific. It would probably
have effects for other language bindings too. I'm also not sure this
clarifies the use of Native.
Regards,
Maciej
Cormack
Cc: Giovanni Campagna; Kruessel, Steffen; Marcin Hanclik; WebApps WG;
i...@hixie.ch
Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
On Jun 30, 2009, at 8:12 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Hi Steffen, Giovanni.
>
> Giovanni Campagna:
>> [Callback], despite the name
On Jun 30, 2009, at 8:12 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Hi Steffen, Giovanni.
Giovanni Campagna:
[Callback], despite the names, does not mean that the interface will
be called back by a method accepting it (although that was the
initial
use case). It barely means that you can convert an Obje
Hi Steffen, Giovanni.
Giovanni Campagna:
> [Callback], despite the names, does not mean that the interface will
> be called back by a method accepting it (although that was the initial
> use case). It barely means that you can convert an Object (in the
> ECMAScript sense) to an object in the WebID
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Giovanni Campagna [mailto:scampa.giova...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:38 PM
> To: Kruessel, Steffen
> Cc: Marcin Hanclik; Cameron McCormack; WebApps WG
> Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
>
>
effen
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Campagna [mailto:scampa.giova...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:38 PM
To: Kruessel, Steffen
Cc: Marcin Hanclik; Cameron McCormack; WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
2009/6/30 Kruessel, Steffen :
> Hi Ma
n advance
> Steffen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Marcin Hanclik
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:26 AM
> To: Cameron McCormack
> Cc: WebApps WG
> Subject: RE: [WebIDL] Callbac
arcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
-Original Message-
From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:c...@mcc.id.au]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:51 AM
To: Marcin Han
Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
-Original Message-
From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:c...@mcc.id.au]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:51 AM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfa
Marcin Hanclik:
> Following our conversation on the geolocation ML
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2009Jun/0173.html
> I have the following clarification request related to the Web IDL spec.
>
> In the geolocation spec we have now:
> [NoInterfaceObject]
> interface Pos
Hi Cameron,
Following our conversation on the geolocation ML
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2009Jun/0173.html
I have the following clarification request related to the Web IDL spec.
In the geolocation spec we have now:
[NoInterfaceObject]
interface PositionOptions {
14 matches
Mail list logo
