On 4/05/10 3:16 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 14:56 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
right, so it would basically end up looking like:
widgets/[specname]
so:
widgets/packaging/
widgets/updates/
widgets/interface/
widgets/digsig/
and so on... for non-widget stuff, I don't know. Maybe we
On May 4, 2010, at 14:56 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> right, so it would basically end up looking like:
>
> widgets/[specname]
>
> so:
>
> widgets/packaging/
> widgets/updates/
> widgets/interface/
> widgets/digsig/
>
> and so on... for non-widget stuff, I don't know. Maybe we need just a general
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> With the WG's permission, I would like to move the widget specs to the
> DVCS platform.
sounds good
> Maybe we can put it on the agenda for discussion tomorrow.
On 4/05/10 2:39 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 14:25 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
With the WG's permission, I would like to move the widget specs to the
DVCS platform. Maybe we can put it on the agenda for discussion
tomorrow.
+1 with the proviso that we put links from the old CVS ver
On May 4, 2010, at 14:25 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> With the WG's permission, I would like to move the widget specs to the
> DVCS platform. Maybe we can put it on the agenda for discussion
> tomorrow.
+1 with the proviso that we put links from the old CVS version to the new stuff
so people don't k
With the WG's permission, I would like to move the widget specs to the
DVCS platform. Maybe we can put it on the agenda for discussion
tomorrow.
Kind regards,
Marcos
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> FYI.
>
> From: Alexandre Bertails berta...@w3.org
> Subject: DVCS platfo
