On Jun 2, 2009, at 16:02, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Jun 2, 2009, at 14:57 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
Please include a corresponding UA requirement to obtain
authorization from the user for the features imported with
feature. (It seems that the security aspect requires an
authorization and
On Jun 23, 2009, at 12:55 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Jun 2, 2009, at 16:02, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Jun 2, 2009, at 14:57 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
Please include a corresponding UA requirement to obtain
authorization from the user for the features imported with
feature. (It seems that the
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Robin Berjonro...@berjon.com wrote:
Precisely: defining behaviour would turn us into a UI specification — which
we dearly want to avoid.
yep.
Constant prompting makes for a dreadful UX, that's for sure,
yep.
but fixing that should be up to UA vendors.
or
On Jun 16, 2009, at 15:42, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Based on Arve and Robin's additional feedback, I've added the
following to the spec as part of The Feature Element section:
How a user agent makes use of features depends on the user agent's
security policy, hence activation and authorization
Hi Henri,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Arve Bersvendsenar...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:57:46 +0200, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
Please state the purpose of feature. (That it's for authorizing features
that don't participate in the Web-oriented browser security
Please state the purpose of feature. (That it's for authorizing
features that don't participate in the Web-oriented browser security
model.)
Please include a corresponding UA requirement to obtain authorization
from the user for the features imported with feature. (It seems that
the
On Jun 2, 2009, at 14:57 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
Please include a corresponding UA requirement to obtain
authorization from the user for the features imported with
feature. (It seems that the security aspect requires an
authorization and doesn't make sense if the dangerous feature are
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:57:46 +0200, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
Please state the purpose of feature. (That it's for authorizing
features that don't participate in the Web-oriented browser security
model.)
Please include a corresponding UA requirement to obtain authorization
from
