Re: Testing Requirements

2011-06-04 Thread Garrett Smith
On 6/3/11, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: You now have: One more list to unsubscribe from. http://www.w3c-test.org:81/ http://www.w3c-test.org:82/ http://www.w3c-test.org:83/ | function assert_readonly(object, property_name, description) | { | var initial_value =

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-06-03 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:15 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 17:47 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Philippe, Just wondering if we have different port support yet on test-w3c.org? Would be nice to at

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-06-03 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Philippe, One more request. I need some way of testing the RFC3490 ToASCII algorithm. In widgets, we are currently using an icann url to do this: access origin=http://हिन्दी.idn.icann.org/ access origin=http://उदाहरण.परीक्षा; subdomains=true/ We basically need some kind of equivalent

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-06-02 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 17:47 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Philippe, Just wondering if we have different port support yet on test-w3c.org? Would be nice to at least have 81, 82 or something (any none-standard ports would

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-18 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:19 +0100, Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Dom, or W3C Staff, Can we please get a full rundown of the systems available on test server. Can we also have all the details about getting access to the server, etc. Here is a description of what we now have: For the testing

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-18 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
to make put this documentation in some common location rather than having essentially the same facts documented once for HTML, once for WebApps, etc.? You can use the general wiki for that. I suggest: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/Requirements It's accessible to anyone who has a W3C account

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-18 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
essentially the same facts documented once for HTML, once for WebApps, etc.? You can use the general wiki for that. I suggest: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/Requirements It's accessible to anyone who has a W3C account. Btw, Mike reminded recently that we also have a general list

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Hi Marcos, Le mardi 15 février 2011 à 13:19 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit : Can we please get a full rundown of the systems available on test server. Can we also have all the details about getting access to the server, etc. Here is what I know off the top of my head: * the content on

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread James Graham
On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: (I see that Art documented most of this in http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought this ought to be confirmed on the list) Is there some way to make put this documentation in some common location rather

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
this documentation in some common location rather than having essentially the same facts documented once for HTML, once for WebApps, etc.? Where are the HTML WG's testing requirements and etc.'s requirements? I am willing to help consolidate common requirements (and to help maintain them). -Art

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread James Graham
on the list) Is there some way to make put this documentation in some common location rather than having essentially the same facts documented once for HTML, once for WebApps, etc.? Where are the HTML WG's testing requirements and etc.'s requirements? There is some test-related text at [1

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Michael[tm] Smith
James Graham jgra...@opera.com, 2011-02-17 11:04 +0100: On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: (I see that Art documented most of this in http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought this ought to be confirmed on the list) Is there some way to

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-15 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi. Its been 3 month and we still dont have a reply? Should we seek establishing official test suites our selves outside the w3c? On 16 Nov 2010 11:46, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: Marcos Caceres from Opera started a wiki on Testing Requirements some time ago. I just updated

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-15 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:54:18 +0100, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote: Its been 3 month and we still dont have a reply? Should we seek establishing official test suites our selves outside the w3c? I think you might have missed this email by PLH:

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-15 Thread marcosc
Quoting Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:54:18 +0100, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote: Its been 3 month and we still dont have a reply? Should we seek establishing official test suites our selves outside the w3c? I think you might have missed this email by

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-15 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:42:15 +0100, marc...@opera.com wrote: Quoting Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Feb/0022.html It covers basics and some of security (from the wiki). Should give us plenty of headway I think. Great! what

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-15 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Dom, or W3C Staff, Can we please get a full rundown of the systems available on test server. Can we also have all the details about getting access to the server, etc. Kind regards, Marcos On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011

Testing Requirements

2010-11-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Marcos Caceres from Opera started a wiki on Testing Requirements some time ago. I just updated it to include some more detail. I think the requirements are roughly the same for HTML and WebApps (apart from WebSockets) which is why I put both in the To field. http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps