Re: [widgets] Widget locale

2008-10-28 Thread Marcos Caceres

Hi Jere,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The definition of 'widget locale' is currently not in sync in the 'Widgets
 1.0: Packaging and Configuration' [1] and 'Widget 1.0: APIs and Events' [2]
 specs. The locale issue has been mentioned earlier by Addison Phillips
 (comment #16 in [3]) and fixed, but I just noticed that the APIs spec
 mentions ISO 639-2 codes, and not BCP 47 tags.


Thanks for pointing this out. We will fix this in before the document
gets published.

 The question also remains how the widget engine reports the system locale to
 the widget as a BCP 47 language tag, if the engine itself is implemented on
 a platform that uses a different locale identification mechanism (which is
 highly likely). In that case some mapping is inevitable, and even though
 this is most likely implementation dependent, maybe a mention to that effect
 would be useful.


We will be sure to include a note about this. We will let you know
once we've added it so you can check that it is ok.

Kind regards,
Marcos


-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au



Re: [widgets] Version string

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Baker

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Marcos Caceres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Thomas,
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You'll want to define what it means for one version string to be greater
 than another one.

 We decided a while back that we would not bother doing this. Version
 are just different.  This avoids all the mess that Arve alluded to,
 and also avoids the Unicode collation mess when of non-ASCII version
 strings.

Right.  It's just like an etag, only not an etag 8-)

Mark.



Re: [widgets] Version string

2008-10-28 Thread Marcos Caceres

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Mark Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Right.  It's just like an etag, only not an etag 8-)

LOL! right :)



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au



scrappy minutes drafts

2008-10-28 Thread Charles McCathieNevile


Hi folks,

in case nobody noticed, there are draft minutes at  
http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-webapps-minutes and  
http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-webapps-minutes


They could do with a clean-up, but I have been busy and not had time to do  
it, so I thought I would point out that they are there. Note that these  
are for the bit of the meeting that didn't deal with widgets.


major results:

We will ask for Proposed Recommendation for Element Traversal, and AC  
permission to do a version 2 (which has a nodelist for children)


We will make a last call for Progress events, and another last call for  
selectors api.


We expect to get last calls for XHR1 and AC4CSR out this year, and expect  
XHR2 to take at least another year.


We will put out a simple file upload API that will support something like  
blob, and we will work at some point on more powerful stuff like File I/O  
and similar device functionality APIs (note that is more or less what is  
in the Bondi work anyway).


We will ask to take on timers, but we still have no editor for the Window  
object.


There may be more in the minutes, but it is late here.

cheers

Chaals

--
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals   Try Opera: http://www.opera.com