Our experience in the math group with the testsuite has shown that
long collaborative test-suite building, web-visible and referenceable
as well as CVS built is really wishable. Eg. we experienced spec-
change only after a given section had a test-case and that test-case
was requested for im
On 25 Nov 2008, at 21:01, Dan Connolly wrote:
In the recent join TAG/WebApps ftf session, I learned that
a lot of that other stuff is not so unrelated.
http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#item12
(Marcos's slides are attached to those minutes thru
a rather indirect route, so here's a
Hi Dan/TAG members,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Dan Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 20:54 -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> Resolving the general topic of ZIP-based packages and URI references within
>> them
>> on the webapp mailing list doesn't seem practical, b
Hi Henry,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 Nov 2008, at 21:01, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
>> In the recent join TAG/WebApps ftf session, I learned that
>> a lot of that other stuff is not so unrelated.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#it
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Transparency: Can the scheme be modeled such that it is an implementation
> detail (i.e. names are private to the UA) and thus never [publicly] exposed?
> What are the consequences if the scheme leaks? If the scheme wil
A couple of questions I have after quickly looking over the WebIDL spec:
1. Although no mention is made of case-sensitivity in the spec, I assume that
all the tokens are case sensitive. Is this correct? By tokens I'm including the
names/values of the extended attributes (e.g. "PutFowards", "Emp
Hi Kartikaya.
Kartikaya Gupta:
> A couple of questions I have after quickly looking over the WebIDL
> spec:
>
> 1. Although no mention is made of case-sensitivity in the spec, I
> assume that all the tokens are case sensitive. Is this correct? By
> tokens I'm including the names/values of the ext
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:18:12 +1100, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes. I've added a paragraph clarifying this:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-grammar
Excellent, thanks.
> The example should be valid, so the confusing sentence is wrong. I've
> reworded
Kartikaya Gupta:
> I have a few other questions that I ran into while implementing:
>
> 3. Can [PutForwards] be chained? That is, what happens if the
> attribute B on J also has a [PutForwards] pointing to something
> else? If chaining is allowed, how are infinite loops dealt with? The
> algorithm
