On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 10/18/11 8:08 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
The other excuse is that adding special cases (which is what you're
asking
for) slows down all the non-special-case codepaths. That may be fine for
_your_ usage of
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Overall, I wholeheartedly support the proposal.
I don't really see the benefit of allowing starting with a combinator. I
think it's a rare case that you actually care about the scope element and in
those cases, using :scope
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:22:46 +0900, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
wrote:
Yehuda is representing jQuery. I'll take his opinion as the global
view unless he choses to say he's representing a personal opinion.
You misunderstand. Boris is contrasting with CSS. Selectors are used in
more
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 10/18/11 8:08 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
The other excuse is that adding special cases (which is what you're
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:22:46 +0900, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
wrote:
Yehuda is representing jQuery. I'll take his opinion as the global
view unless he choses to say he's representing a personal opinion.
You
On 19/10/11 2:39 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
Overall, I wholeheartedly support the proposal.
I don't really see the benefit of allowing starting with a combinator.
I think it's a rare case that you actually care about the scope
element and in those cases, using :scope is fine. Instead of
On 2011-10-19 01:58, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Based on discussion on the mailing list,style scoped will be
changing to the latter behavior as well, with the ability to invoke
the former behavior in the rare circumstances when you explicitly want
it.
Despite some similarities in appearance, the
On 2011-10-18 18:42, Alex Russell wrote:
Related and equally important, that querySelector and querySelectorAll
are often referred to by the abbreviation QSA suggests that its name
is bloated and improved versions should have shorter names.
I know the names suck. The names we ended up with
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote:
On 2011-10-18 18:42, Alex Russell wrote:
Related and equally important, that querySelector and querySelectorAll
are often referred to by the abbreviation QSA suggests that its name
is bloated and improved versions
On 10/19/11 4:22 AM, Alex Russell wrote:
Yehuda is representing jQuery. I'll take his opinion as the global
view unless he choses to say he's representing a personal opinion.
Global jQuery view, yes? I stand by a slightly statement that what is
common and needs to be fast for Yehuda may not
On 10/19/11 4:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:22:46 +0900, Alex Russell
slightly...@google.com wrote:
Yehuda is representing jQuery. I'll take his opinion as the global
view unless he choses to say he's representing a personal opinion.
You misunderstand. Boris is
On 10/19/11 11:17 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
4) Mapping Sizzle(#id) with document a context to
getElementById(id). This isn't a valid optimization for querySelector
because there can be multiple elements with the same id;
And just as a note, since someone asked me off-list how this can
possibly
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14513
Summary: WebSocket API: Missing reference for definition of
MessageEvent
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
On 2011-10-19 16:08, Alex Russell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Lachlan Huntlachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote:
I have attempted to address this problem before and the algorithm for
parsing a *scoped selector string* (basically what you're calling a
rootedSelector) existed in an old
On 2011-10-18 18:42, Alex Russell wrote:
HTMLDocument.prototype.find =
HTMLElement.prototype.find = function(rootedSelector) {
return this.querySelector(:scope + rootedSelector);
}
HTMLDocument.prototype.findAll =
HTMLElement.prototype.findAll = function(rootedSelector)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote:
1. Syntax
In style scoped, selectors still can't begin with a combinator, but in the
proposed API, they can.
I agree with Lachy here. I think it's valuable to have consistency
with style scoped, so that a selector
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
Lachlan and I have been having an...um...*spirited* twitter discussion
regarding querySelectorAll, the (deceased?) queryScopedSelectorAll,
and :scope. He asked me to continue here, so I'll try to keep it
short:
The
On 10/19/11 10:07 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I like the general idea here. And since we're changing behavior, I
think it's a good opportunity to come up with shorter names. Naming is
really hard. The shorter names we use, the more likely it is that
we're going to break webpages which are messing
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
.findAll(body :scope div) // returns nothing
Wouldn't this return ids 1,2,3 if we're not prepending :scope as you say
below?
Yes, but he was
WebEvents WG is taking up this spec. I've created a new Mouse Lock
thread on public-webevents:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011OctDec/0066.html
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
wrote:
Lachlan and I have been having an...um...*spirited* twitter discussion
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
.findAll(body :scope div) // returns nothing
Wouldn't this return ids
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
Lachlan and I have been having an...um...*spirited* twitter discussion
regarding querySelectorAll, the (deceased?) queryScopedSelectorAll,
and :scope. He asked me to continue here, so I'll try to keep it
short:
The
23 matches
Mail list logo
