Hi Hallvord,
While reviewing https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/86, I found the changed
version assumes not firing readystatechange for the subsequent open() calls
where the readyState is already 1, which in my understanding is not
conformed to the current spec text.
Commits are specifically:
I just noticed that the topic has been discussed in another thread early
this week. Sorry for rushing around after all that. BTW, what was the
conclusion?
-Original Message-
From: Jungkee Song [mailto:jungkee.s...@samsung.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:33 PM
To:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22059
Bug ID: 22059
Summary: Composition dictionary should be changed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22058
Bug ID: 22058
Summary: error event should fire before final
readystatechange event
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
I just noticed that the topic has been discussed in another thread early
this week. Sorry for rushing around after all that. BTW, what was the
conclusion?
The conclusion is this commit:
https://github.com/whatwg/xhr/commit/972797fb12106ca00292b9a2e2cb91d8766c4640
which seems reasonable to
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22058
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16304
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
-Original Message-
From: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen [mailto:hallv...@opera.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 7:02 PM
The conclusion is this commit:
https://github.com/whatwg/xhr/commit/972797fb12106ca00292b9a2e2cb91d8766c4
640
The ED has been updated with the change:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
Case study: img was historically not capable of executing script from an
external file. This lead to sites expecting img to be safe (e.g. allow
untrusted comments to use img). When browsers wanted to support SVG in
img,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
hallv...@opera.com wrote:
Say, for example, OpenID is a setup where the user might provide an
untrusted URL to a third-party web site (Here's the service that can
authenticate me), and XHR might be involved - but the Open ID
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Angelina Fabbro
angelinafab...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume meeting notes will be posted to the list for those who can't
attend? A lot of good topics there.
Yes!
There's a new ::distributed() pseudo-element function, which
provides a way for a shadow tree to
StreamReader proposed in the Streams API spec is almost the same as
FileReader. By adding the maxSize argument to the readAs methods (new
methods or just add it to existing methods as an optional argument) and
adding the readAsBlob method, FileReader can cover all what StreamReader
provides. Has
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Takeshi Yoshino tyosh...@google.com wrote:
StreamReader proposed in the Streams API spec is almost the same as
FileReader. By adding the maxSize argument to the readAs methods (new
methods or just add it to existing methods as an optional argument) and
adding
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com]
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Takeshi Yoshino tyosh...@google.com
wrote:
StreamReader proposed in the Streams API spec is almost the same as
FileReader. By adding the maxSize argument to the readAs methods (new
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Jonas Sicking
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com]
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
Since we have Streams implemented to some degree, I'd love to hear
suggestions to improve it relative to IO. Anne can you summarize the
Can you please go into a bit more detail? I've read through the thread, and it
mostly focuses on the details of how a Stream is received from XHR and what
behaviors can be expected - it only lightly touches on how you can operate on a
stream after it is received.
The StreamReader by design
I skimmed the thread before starting this and saw that you were pointing
out some issues but didn't think you're opposing so much.
Let me check requirements.
a) We don't want to introduce a completely new object for streaming HTTP
read/write, but we'll realize it by adding some extension
This is a Request for Comments for the 16 May 2013 Last Call Working
Draft of Indexed Database:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-IndexedDB-20130516/
The comment deadline is June 7 and all comments should be sent to the
public-webapps@w3.org list.
-Thanks, AB
It appears there is no longer sufficient interest to move the Widget
Updates on the Recommendation track so this is a Call for Consensus to
publish this spec as a WG Note and thus formally stop work on it.
If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them to
20 matches
Mail list logo
