[Bug 27261] [Custom]: definition construction algorithm step 6 makes no sense

[bugzilla]

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27261

Dimitri Glazkov (afk until Dec 1, 2014) dglaz...@chromium.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Dimitri Glazkov (afk until Dec 1, 2014) 
dglaz...@chromium.org ---
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #4)

 Looking at the PR, the definition of SVG-PROTOTYPE is wrong: you want it to
 be the interface prototype object, not the interface object.  Other than
 that, this looks good.

Fixed and landed in
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commit/189b608a196f5464d8623817ed78e721de0e257b.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[webmessaging] Need to analyze test failures

[Arthur Barstow]

Hi Cindy, Kris, All,

Earlier today I ran the webmessaging tests on Chrome, FF, IE and Opera 
(12.16) and uploaded the results plus the wptreport files to 
[test-results]. The good news is that 104/118 tests (~90%) have 2 or 
more passes, however, there are also 14 tests with less than passes.


Do you have some time to look at the [2] failures? For each of these 
failures, it would be helpful to know which ones are actually test case 
failures versus implementation bugs, and in the case of impl bugs, to 
get a sense of their priority (f.ex. {low,medium,high} impact on 
interoperability.


Naturally, we would appreciate help from anyone that is willing to 
review these failures.


-Thanks, ArtB

[test-results] 
https://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/webmessaging

[2] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/less-than-2.html