Re: [WebCrypto.Next] Any ideas on how to proceed?

2015-02-18 Thread David Leon Gil
W.r.t. WebCrypto-Next: It would be wonderful to see a few useful algorithms added to the spec: - a modern VOF (e.g., SHAKE256) - a fast hash function (e.g., BLAKE2b) - a sequential-hard KDF (e.g., scrypt) - some non-NSA curves as well as a slightly higher-level interface that makes it less compl

Re: [WebCrypto.Next] Any ideas on how to proceed?

2015-02-18 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2015-02-18 08:59, David Leon Gil wrote: W.r.t. WebCrypto-Next: It would be wonderful to see a few useful algorithms added to the spec: - a modern VOF (e.g., SHAKE256) - a fast hash function (e.g., BLAKE2b) - a sequential-hard KDF (e.g., scrypt) - some non-NSA curves as well as a slightly hi

Showing from HTML import

2015-02-18 Thread Ashley Gullen
I filed crbug.com/458799 for Chrome recently since showing a defined in a HTML import did not work as I thought it should. I can't compare to any other browsers since right now AFAIK Chrome is the only browser shipping both HTML imports and . There seemed to be some confusion from the browser deve

Re: Showing from HTML import

2015-02-18 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Can you file a spec bug? https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?comment=&blocked=20683&short_desc=%5Bimports%5D%3A%20&product=WebAppsWG&import=import%20Model :DG< On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Ashley Gullen wrote: > I filed crbug.com/458799 for Chrome recently since showing a > defin

Re: Showing from HTML import

2015-02-18 Thread Ashley Gullen
Filed: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28051 Ashley On 18 February 2015 at 15:29, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > Can you file a spec bug? > > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?comment=&blocked=20683&short_desc=%5Bimports%5D%3A%20&product=WebAppsWG&import=import%20Model >

[Bug 28051] [imports]: showing from import

2015-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28051 Anne changed: What|Removed |Added CC||public-webapps@w3.org Component|DOM

Web Components F2F in April 2015

2015-02-18 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Folks, Following Art's suggestion [1], I propose a Web Components-specific F2F with with the primary goal of reaching consensus on the Shadow DOM contentious bits [2]. When: Friday, April 24, 2015 Where: Google San Francisco or Mountain View (to be confirmed) What: a one-day meeting Tentative ag

Mozilla on Privileged Hosted Apps

2015-02-18 Thread Anders Rundgren
It seems that the web indeed is at a cross-road when it comes to applications that are intended to be on par with native: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.webapi/pCY77YAg_i4 The Web2Native Bridge is another take on this matter: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-i

[Bug 28054] New: Focus on shadow host should slide to its inner focusable node

2015-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28054 Bug ID: 28054 Summary: Focus on shadow host should slide to its inner focusable node Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All

Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM

2015-02-18 Thread 河内 隆仁
Hi, Thanks for the feedback from you all. During the discussion on the feedback, I've filed a couple of bugs. Any comments are welcome. [Shadow]: Shadow host with tabindex=-1, all descendent tree should be ignored for tab navigation https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27965 Focus on