Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

On 2015-10-18 19:09, Aymeric Vitte wrote: Le 17/10/2015 16:19, Anders Rundgren a écrit : Unless you work for a browser vendor or is generally "recognized" for some specialty, nothing seems to be of enough interest to even get briefly evaluated. Right, that's a deficiency of the

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Please stop on your side giving lessons again and stop trying to isolate/elude my initial answer, and refrain people on this list not to be insulting first. This one was not insulting, just a general consideration and you should consider it. But indeed, back to the "in-scope" technical

Re: Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Offlist. On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:36:54 +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-10-17 17:58, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: Regarding App-to-App interaction I'm personally mainly into the Web-to-Native variant. As I already pointed out to Daniel, this stuff is

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Daniel, as far as I can read the post, copy-and-paste-interoperability would be a "sub-task" of this. It's not a very small task though. In my world, E.g., there was a person who inventend a "math" protocol handler. For him it meant that formulæ be read out loud (because his mission is making the

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Le 17/10/2015 16:19, Anders Rundgren a écrit : > Unless you work for a browser vendor or is generally "recognized" for some > specialty, nothing seems to be of enough interest to even get briefly > evaluated. > Right, that's a deficiency of the W3C/WHATWG/whatever specs process, where people

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Anders Rundgren wrote: > Unless you work for a browser vendor or is generally "recognized" for > some > specialty, nothing seems to be of enough interest to even get briefly > evaluated. Maybe the right thing is assemble "user representative" groups and be enough heard on such places as this