Re: [widgets] Updates FPWD published

2008-10-10 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-10-10 10:38 +0300: On Oct 10, 2008, at 01:44, Marcos Caceres wrote: http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-updates/ [...] The Editor's Draft link points to the Editor's Draft of another spec. Fixed --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [widgets] Updates FPWD published

2008-10-10 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Henri, On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 10, 2008, at 01:44, Marcos Caceres wrote: http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-updates/ As always, comments welcomed. The sentence An update source is the URi referenced by the src attribute of the an

Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32

2008-10-10 Thread Jonas Sicking
Jonas Sicking wrote: * ISSUE-30 Should spec have wording to recognise that User Agents may implement further security beyond the spec? http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/30 I guess this is the part that needs to be addressed by adding wording to the spec to say that the cache can

Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again

2008-10-10 Thread Mark Baker
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Marcos Caceres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. I will add Any hierarchical URI scheme as the proposed solution into the spec. I will say that, personally, I feel it is irresponsible for the WebApps WG to not recommend a complete and a secure solution for this

Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again

2008-10-10 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Mark Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Marcos Caceres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. I will add Any hierarchical URI scheme as the proposed solution into the spec. I will say that, personally, I feel it is irresponsible for the