Hi Dom, Robin.
Dominique Hazael-Massieux:
> > What are the plans for stabilizing WebIDL and pushing it to Rec? The
> > charter has it initially at CR in Q4 2008 - which obviously hasn't
> > happened :)
Apologies for not having had time to work on it recently. My (most
recent) plans were to have
Hi all,
some of you may remember that Ericsson when joining the WebApps WG made a
reference to patents US 6,321,250, EP1310114 and PCT/EP2008/064352 (not yet
published). Someone may have assumed Ericsson would disclose or even exclude
from W3C RF licensing as defined in the W3 Patent Policy som
Below is an email from Addison (forwarded with his permission) re the
IRI/URI normalization thread.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: "ext Phillips, Addison"
Date: September 16, 2009 1:13:58 PM EDT
To: "Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" ,
Richard Ishida
Cc: w3c-archive ,
I haven't seen any comments yet on this issue?
(This may just be me misunderstanding the intended meaning of "origin"
in this context.)
On 19 Aug 2009, at 11:42, Scott Wilson wrote:
sue:
5. Storage Areas
"A storage area is a data-store that is unique for the origin of a
widget, which a us
Marcos suggested some possible solutions to the issue of implementing
protected preferences in the storage area using a pure JavaScript
solution, and I've implemented some changes to Apache Wookie
(incubating) which I think moves us closer to conformance.
I've tested this on Firefox 3.5b an
On Sep 16, 2009, at 16:47 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
What are the plans for stabilizing WebIDL and pushing it to Rec? The
charter has it initially at CR in Q4 2008 - which obviously hasn't
happened :)
In the case in which WebIDL is not realistically believed to be
moveable forward qui
Hello WebApps Working Group,
A growing number of groups is relying on WebIDL to define their APIs,
including the Device APIs and Policy Working Group (cc'd).
As some of the said specs are likely to reach PR in the upcoming months
(e.g. Geolocation?), their normative dependence on WebIDL risk to d
Hi Marcos,
I will try to do it next week in Dusseldorf then.
Even if an/your implementation handles it, I assume the details should be
speced.
Thanks,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc
Marcin,
Lets try this another way. Can you make me a widget that explicitly
demos the problem? I will then run it against our implementation and
see what happens.
I will also add the widget to the test suite, to make sure we expose
and potential misunderstandings in the spec wrt URIs.
Kind regard
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Marcin Hanclik
wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
>>>So it turns out that %-encoded really just means "replace this '%xx'
>>>with UTF-8 bytes".
> Yes.
>
>>>So we don't need to do anything.
> P&C shall state the actual algorithm and equivalence.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD
Regrets, i'm on vacation for a month starting tomorrow
Below is the draft agenda for the September 17 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
Hi,
I think we should not mix Resource Identifiers with schemes and scheme names
(aka semantics and syntax).
As for me WRI and XRI are schemes that follow URI/IRI syntax and define new
scheme names and add semantics/interpretation.
I hope that the terms "scheme", "scheme-name" will be fixed in
Hi Marcos,
>>So it turns out that %-encoded really just means "replace this '%xx'
>>with UTF-8 bytes".
Yes.
>>So we don't need to do anything.
P&C shall state the actual algorithm and equivalence.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-apis-20090423/
had this issue:
"ISSUE: do we need to do some k
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> >>
> >> With the recent move to structured clones in Web Storage, I'm
> >> wondering if a serialization for those clones needs to be specified?
> >
> >
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>
>> With the recent move to structured clones in Web Storage, I'm
>> wondering if a serialization for those clones needs to be specified?
>
> Nothing in HTML5 exposes a serialisation.
I know that (w
Hi Art,
Thank you for the clarification.
Kind regards,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia
17 matches
Mail list logo
