Re: Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?

2010-04-13 Thread Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 17:47 +, Ian Hickson a écrit : Server sent events doesn't require any change to the network, it's compatible with almost any setup that uses HTTP today. Web Sockets requires that intermediaries support full-duplex connections. Server sent events is compatible

[IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas

2010-04-13 Thread Mark Seaborn
Is there any plan for involving the user in storage allocation decisions for IndexedDB? [1] For comparison, the WebStorage API [2] doesn't have any special support for the user to make allocation choices. My understanding is that browsers have a fixed storage limit per origin -- in Chromium, 5Mb

Re: VMMF updated

2010-04-13 Thread Arthur Barstow
Robin, All, On Apr 12, 2010, at 7:15 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: VMMF has been updated with all feedback that had been sent to the list, I look forward to commenters indicating love or hatred for the changes. I support the recent changes and think the spec is ready for LC. There are two

Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec

2010-04-13 Thread Arthur Barstow
All - FYI, I think the next steps here are to hash out some process related issues so I started a related discussion on the public- hypertext-cg mail list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hypertext-cg/2010AprJun/ 0001.html -Art Barstow On Apr 12, 2010, at 4:12 PM, ext Marcos

Re: Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with callback

2010-04-13 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:39:47 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: All - FYI, I think the next steps here are to hash out some process related issues so I started a related discussion on the public- hypertext-cg mail list:

Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())

2010-04-13 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:28:53 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: I wouldn't be opposed to implementing UMP, as long as there's a decent API for invoking it, and that it's a good subset relative to CORS. I think we've talked about various constructors or flags that let you use the XHR

Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas

2010-04-13 Thread João Eiras
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:09:14 +0200, Mark Seaborn mseab...@chromium.org wrote: Is there any plan for involving the user in storage allocation decisions for IndexedDB? [1] For comparison, the WebStorage API [2] doesn't have any special support for the user to make allocation choices. My

XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal

2010-04-13 Thread Mike Belshe
Hi, I'm a developer on the chrome team, and also working on SPDY. Others here at Google have requested that we expose some of the priority-based resource loading mechanics to applications so that applications can hint to the browser more information about which resources are critical and which

Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())

2010-04-13 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Apr 12, 2010, at 4:00 PM, ext Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Tyler Close wrote: I've added a new section to the wiki page, UMP as subset of CORS: http://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/ Comparison_of_CORS_and_UMP#UMP_as_subset_of_CORS I do not think the set of subset

Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal

2010-04-13 Thread Mike Belshe
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fiwrote: Hi, Thanks for the comments. this seems like a pretty useful, yet reasonable easily implementable feature. Good to hear. I'd add 5th value NORMAL, which would be the default value. const unsigned short

Re: Not making partial result available during FileReader.readAsText()?

2010-04-13 Thread Jian Li
This is what I also feel. I am going to set total and loaded based on binary data. Just want to make sure we're in the same page for those that are spec-ed out clearly. On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: Unfortunately I think decoded data is impossible as you

Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?

2010-04-13 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com wrote: Hmmm... maybe FormData could have a toBlob() method, and an inverse means of initializing a FormData object with a properly encoded Blob. What's the use case? ;) / Jonas

Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?

2010-04-13 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com wrote: Hmmm... maybe FormData could have a toBlob() method, and an inverse

Re: FormData and BlobBuilder - duplication of functionality?

2010-04-13 Thread Michael Nordman
Good question. Let me ask you one. What value should you use for the content-type header? That value needs to contain the boundary string. You need to know that to xhr.send the data in a way that looks like a form submission. Just sending the blob will be off by one and the server side won't