[Bug 13834] New: Garbage collection policy for XMLHttpRequestUpload

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13834 Summary: Garbage collection policy for XMLHttpRequestUpload Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 13839] New: Merge adjacent inline markup when deleting

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13839 Summary: Merge adjacent inline markup when deleting Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Bug 13841] New: Investigate what should happen when hitting Enter inside nested single-line containers

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13841 Summary: Investigate what should happen when hitting Enter inside nested single-line containers Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All

[Bug 13842] New: One issue that I have noticed is that there is no way to create an EventSource and attach event listeners to it before it connects to the server. This means that there is no way to

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13842 Summary: One issue that I have noticed is that there is no way to create an EventSource and attach event listeners to it before it connects to the server. This means that

RE: http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#key-construct ordering confusion

According to the text, I would expect negative infinity to be the lowest possible key, and the highest possible key to be undefined (because an array of any candidate highest key followed by another valid key would be even higher) Yes. You are correct. / Jonas I rewrote the note

[Bug 13842] One issue that I have noticed is that there is no way to create an EventSource and attach event listeners to it before it connects to the server. This means that there is no way to ensu

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13842 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 9738] Improve IDL documentation

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9738 Eliot Graff eliot...@microsoft.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

Re: [IndexedDB] Transaction Auto-Commit

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.comwrote: On Thursday, August 04, 2011 11:02 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: [snip] I'd be open to allowing read transactions which are started after a write transaction to see the before-write database contents. Would