+Paul Kinlan, Greg Billock - from Google team.
+Mike Hanson, Ben Adida - from Mozilla team.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> Should Paul Kinlan be Cc'd on this? His concept work is helpful.
>
>
>
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> >
> > Why not just
I am the tech lead for the team designing and implementing Web Intents [1]
for Chrome at Google. Web Intents is a web platform feature modeled after
the similarly named feature in Android OS. Web Intents enables client sites
to request high-level functionality, e.g. share, edit, pick, upload, aut
Should Paul Kinlan be Cc'd on this? His concept work is helpful.
On Sep 19, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> Why not just improve both navigator.registerContentHandler and
> navigator.registerProtocolHandler?
>
> In particular, why are intents registered via a new HTML element rathe
Why not just improve both navigator.registerContentHandler and
navigator.registerProtocolHandler?
In particular, why are intents registered via a new HTML element rather
than an API? How do you unregister? How do you determine if the intent was
registered or not? How do you conditionally regis
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
>
> WebWorkers (51 tests/assertions)
> Changeset: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/rev/7b0ba70f69b6
> Tests: http://w3c-test.org/webapps/Workers/tests/submissions/Microsoft/
> * We believe the tests are all accurate but look forward to wider r
I'm forwarding this on behalf of a colleague whose message seems caught up
in a moderation queue. Apologies if it results in a duplicate message for
anyone.
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Hawkins
Date: Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 PM
Subject: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13777
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 9/19/11 10:54 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, September 19, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
FYI, there is some precedence for publishing Requirements docs as
Recommendations (e.g. OWL UCs and Reqs) . If we want to go that route,
it would presumably mean publishing a LC, skip
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13938
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14063
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14069
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Since you are the Chair of the HTML Editing APIs CG [CG], would you please
> explain what you see as the relationship between the CG and WebApps
> vis-à-vis the Editing spec? In particular, what role(s) do the CG and WG
> have?
I notice yo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Aryeh - coming back to your question below ...
>
> Since you are the Chair of the HTML Editing APIs CG [CG], would you please
> explain what you see as the relationship between the CG and WebApps
> vis-à-vis the Editing spec? In particular,
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:48:04 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Aryeh - coming back to your question below ...
Since you are the Chair of the HTML Editing APIs CG [CG], would you
please explain what you see as the relationship between the CG and
WebApps vis-à-vis the Editing spec? In particular,
Aryeh - coming back to your question below ...
Since you are the Chair of the HTML Editing APIs CG [CG], would you
please explain what you see as the relationship between the CG and
WebApps vis-à-vis the Editing spec? In particular, what role(s) do the
CG and WG have?
For example [1] indicat
On Monday, September 19, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> FYI, there is some precedence for publishing Requirements docs as
> Recommendations (e.g. OWL UCs and Reqs) . If we want to go that route,
> it would presumably mean publishing a LC, skipping CR (not applicable
> for this spec)
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14220
Summary: In reply to comment #0) > Every browser that I know of
can have two web pages open at once. Those 2 web >
pages both have a DOM, they don't share a DOM.Some
brow
Hi Marcos,
On 9/16/11 10:14 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Friday, 16 September 2011 at 20:04, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Marcos, All,
To clearly state that WebApps' work on the Widget Requirements and
Widget Landscape documents has ended, I propose they be published as
Working Group Notes:
ht
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14218
Summary: Check CharData when serializing Text
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
On Monday, September 19, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Le samedi 17 septembre 2011 à 10:30 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
> > shortcut: if you want to (incorrectly, IMO) continue to lump widgets
> > and app cache, then do so making it clear that this is just one of the
>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14214
Summary: missing definition of Transferable
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Le samedi 17 septembre 2011 à 10:30 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
> shortcut: if you want to (incorrectly, IMO) continue to lump widgets
> and app cache, then do so making it clear that this is just one of the
> use cases for widgets and certainly NOT the primary use case…
My document focuses on
22 matches
Mail list logo
