On Thursday, February 23, 2012 4:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Simon Pieters
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:47:56 +0100, Odin Hørthe Omdal
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:27:27 +0100, Jonas Sicking
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes! I would love to
On 24.2.2012 20:49, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 24.2.2012 20:12, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Bronislav,
I could also go with reverse approach, with createObjectURL being
oneTimeOnly by default
createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolean? isPermanent)
instead of current
createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolea
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15527
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
> On 24.2.2012 20:12, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
> > Bronislav,
> >
> >
> >> I could also go with reverse approach, with createObjectURL being
> >> oneTimeOnly by default
> >> createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolean? isPermanent)
> >> instead of current
> >> createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolean? isOneTime)
On 24.2.2012 20:12, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Bronislav,
I could also go with reverse approach, with createObjectURL being
oneTimeOnly by default
createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolean? isPermanent)
instead of current
createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolean? isOneTime)
the fact, that user would have
Bronislav,
> I could also go with reverse approach, with createObjectURL being
> oneTimeOnly by default
> createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolean? isPermanent)
> instead of current
> createObjectURL(Blob aBlob, boolean? isOneTime)
> the fact, that user would have to explicitly specify, that such URL
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13118
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16094
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10234
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|REMIND |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Ian
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7720
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|REMIND |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Ian '
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16108
Summary: [IndexedDB] (editorial) bound(), lowerBound() and
upperBound() have open mixed
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Sta
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hi Charles,
On 2/23/12 9:09 PM, ext Charles Pritchard wrote:
Regarding UI components in web applications
...
Please consider these UI issues as a whole, find a coherent narrative
about the problem. If and when we can get that far, maybe we can have
a webapps-ui group, and discuss the parti
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16103
Summary: Remove DOMStringList usage
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compon
14 matches
Mail list logo