>> Not quite :) Check the list of events - mousemove isn't included:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#allowed-to-show-a-popup
> I was just going by where I¹ve seen pages pop up windows, and I¹ve seen
> pages that pop up windows just by moving the mouse across them.
If you see that agai
Cross-posting as before ...
What: IndieUI Task Force Teleconference
When: Wednesday 17 September
2:00 PMSan Francisco -- U.S. Pacific (Daylight) Time (PDT:
UTC -7)
4:00 PMAustin -- U.S. Central (Daylight) Time (CDT: UTC -5)
5:00 PMBoston
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
> Is either one of you working on innerText specification?
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Mar/0008.html)
>
> I think we need it for the selection API specification because the
> concept of being “visually equivalent” and selecti
Hi,
Is either one of you working on innerText specification?
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Mar/0008.html)
I think we need it for the selection API specification because the concept of
being “visually equivalent” and selection.toString need to be defined in terms
of it.
-
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Hallvord R. M. Steen
wrote:
>... if we get it right we've enabled some more functionality
> for web apps without too much nuisance and abuse -
> if we get it wrong, we probably have to revisit this and
> lock it down with site whitelists and such. Keeping in mind
>
On 9/16/14, 5:22 AM, "James M. Greene"
mailto:james.m.gre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> We did some user research on this feature when we were building our most
> recent flagship product a few years back. Our users' reactions to a sane site
> enhancing their clipboard data were unanimously delighted
>> a page can wipe out my entire clipboard history if I move my mouse over
>>it.
> Not quite :) Check the list of events - mousemove isn't included:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#allowed-to-show-a-popup
I was just going by where I¹ve seen pages pop up windows, and I¹ve seen
pages tha
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13952
Ryosuke Niwa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24083
Ryosuke Niwa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Regardless of protocol, a site that contains sensitive data should be
implemented such that it doesn't use this API nor include any unverified
3rd party libraries/extension that may. They should also only utilize a
feature such as this in obvious ways (i.e. by having the user click on a
"copy" butt
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> Again, what are you trying to defend against? Why is it beneficial to try to
> block this?
At minimum, its information leakage. If the data has value such that
at least one leg requires HTTPS, then traversing some legs with HTTP
is a security
We did some user research on this feature when we were building our most
recent flagship product a few years back. Our users' reactions to a sane
site enhancing their clipboard data were unanimously delighted rather than
upset/offended/horrified.
As Hallvord said, sites have been able to do this f
On 7/9/14 4:15 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ Bcc: public-pointer-events ]
FYI, Robin reports the availability of minutes from the September 11 EWS
in Berlin:
[[
as you may know, last week the second edition of the "Extensible Web
Summit" took place in Berlin. It was fun an interesting.
The
> a page can wipe out my
> entire clipboard history if I move my mouse over it.
Not quite :) Check the list of events - mousemove isn't included:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#allowed-to-show-a-popup
I agree that all the concerns you listed are real. I recall an article I've
seen abou
> Wouldn't it be better for the user if a consistent policy were applied
> across the board when handling their data?
Not if the average user can't understand the policy that is applied, and the
way it applies to what they are trying to achieve.
> Proper handling of the data shifts the onus to
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26815
Bug ID: 26815
Summary: [Shadow]:
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
16 matches
Mail list logo
