Regrets. We’ll be signing mortgage paperwork at this time.
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
> Cross-posting as before ...
>
> What:IndieUI Task Force Teleconference
> When:Wednesday 1 October
> 2:00 PMSan Francisco -- U.S. Pacific (Daylight) Time (PDT:
Cross-posting as before ...
What: IndieUI Task Force Teleconference
When: Wednesday 1 October
2:00 PMSan Francisco -- U.S. Pacific (Daylight) Time (PDT:
UTC -7)
4:00 PMAustin -- U.S. Central (Daylight) Time (CDT: UTC -5)
5:00 PMBoston --
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2014Aug/0081.html
- I recently got some good offline feedback on the proposal, need to update
it, stay tuned.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2014Aug/0177.html
- related~ish, may be of interest.
ig
On Tue, Sep 30
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Chad Austin wrote:
> > What will it take to get this added to the spec?
>
> There's been a pretty long debate on the WHATWG mailing list how to
> prioritize fetches of all things. I recommend contributi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Chad Austin wrote:
> What will it take to get this added to the spec?
There's been a pretty long debate on the WHATWG mailing list how to
prioritize fetches of all things. I recommend contributing there. I
don't think we should focus on just XMLHttpRequest.
--
Hi all,
I would like to see a priority field added to XMLHttpRequest. Mike
Belshe's proposal here is a great start:
http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg08218.html
*Motivation*
Browsers already prioritize network requests. By giving XMLHttpRequest
access to the same machinery,
On 9/4/14 8:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Michael, All,
Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this
email was accidentally moved to my "Back Burner" folder where I just
noticed it)!
Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Editors to update
their docu