On 9/4/14 8:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Michael, All,
Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this
email was accidentally moved to my "Back Burner" folder where I just
noticed it)!
Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Editors to update
their documents accordingly, are there any specs that are of high/keen
interest to you? (WebApps' spec list is
<https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus>.)
Hi Michael, All,
Yves and Cindy agreed to take the lead to followup on your request. My
expectation is they will check all of WebApps' specs and if/when a spec
could be improved, they will file a Bug/Issue accordingly.
Again, if you and/or your colleagues have specific specs that concern
you, please do let us know.
-Thanks, Art
On 6/20/14 10:33 AM, Michael Cooper wrote:
The WAI Protocols and Formats Working Group has looked at a number of
specifications published by the Web Applications Working Group
recently. Our process is to note the publication of documents and
take a quick look to determine if they need a closer review. However,
many of the documents we have looked at recently have extremely brief
abstracts, and no introductions. This makes it very difficult for us
to figure out the nature of the specification, and in turn to
determine what our interest in it might be.
We request that you add more complete abstracts to the
specifications, to provide a high-level but more complete idea of
what the specification does. We also request that you add
introduction sections to the specifications, to explain what problem
the technology solves and how (in general terms) it addresses that.
We think this will aid our own review and will also greatly help
other reviewers to make useful comments.
Michael Cooper
PFWG staff contact
