[Bug 27829] [Shadow]: Update ShadowRoot to have elementsFromPoint and caretPositionFromPoint

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27829 Hayato Ito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 28493] New: [Shadow]: Have a common interface between Document and ShadowRoot

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28493 Bug ID: 28493 Summary: [Shadow]: Have a common interface between Document and ShadowRoot Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All

[Bug 21066] Provide an event path API

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21066 Hayato Ito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 27637] [Shadow]: Explain the CSS inheritance in terms of Composed Tree

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27637 Hayato Ito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 27359] [Shadow]: Need to define interaction with directionality

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27359 Hayato Ito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 15 April at 21:00Z

Cross-posting as is usual ... What: IndieUI Task Force Teleconference When: Wednesday 15 April 2:00 PMSan Francisco -- U.S. Pacific Time (PDT: UTC -7) 4:00 PMAustin -- U.S. Central Time(CDT: UTC -5) 5:00 PMBoston -- U.S. Eas

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

We found some timing issues with polyfill HTML Imports and native Custom Elements in Chrome that made us force the Custom Elements polyfill when HTML Imports is polyfilled. I don't remember the specifics, but I filed the github issue to either track down and resolve the issues, or provide a flag

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

Just to close the loop, filed https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/issues/289 to track the specific Polymer web component polyfill blocker. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Dimitri Glazkov > wrote: > > Thanks for the feedbac

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Dimitri Glazkov > wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback! While the iron is hot I went ahead and > > created/updated bugs in the tracker. > > A problem I have with this approach is that with Shadow DOM (and m

[Bug 28491] New: [Shadow]: [Meta] Unblock Mozilla's shipping of Shadow DOM

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28491 Bug ID: 28491 Summary: [Shadow]: [Meta] Unblock Mozilla's shipping of Shadow DOM Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All

Re: WebIDL Plans

On 4/14/15 8:22 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: I remember ArrayClass removed from NodeList for the reason of lack of implementations, and even plans for implementation It was removed because as things stand it's not web-compatible. Once @@isConcatSpreadable exists in implementations, we could and sho

Re: PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's "Modern Tooling" project

On 14 April 2015 at 14:29, Arthur Barstow wrote: > [Bcc public-openw3c ] > > Hi All, > > In case you missed it, last February, Robin, Philippe and others (see [1] > for a list of contributors) started a project to "capture the state of the > discussion about modernising the tooling that supports

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! While the iron is hot I went ahead and > created/updated bugs in the tracker. A problem I have with this approach is that with Shadow DOM (and maybe Web Components in general) there's a lot of open bugs. Of those bu

PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's "Modern Tooling" project

[Bcc public-openw3c ] Hi All, In case you missed it, last February, Robin, Philippe and others (see [1] for a list of contributors) started a project to "capture the state of the discussion about modernising the tooling that supports the making of W3C standards". The working document is

Re: WebIDL Plans

> On 10 Apr 2015, at 18:49, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > On 4/10/15 8:53 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> * Everything from old v1 expect ArrayClass which is not used, nor >> implemented anywhere. > > It's implemented in Gecko and used for both DOMRectList and MediaList in > Gecko, fwiw. > > I'm not s

[W3C TCP and UDP Socket API] Informal CfC on moving the SysApps TCP and UDP Socket APi to a Community Group

The SysApps WG charter expired Oct 1 2014 and no re-chartering process is in progress. Similar to Wayne Carr's CfC on Intel's SysApps specification, https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2015Mar/0001.html, I am issuing an informal CfC on moving the SysApps TCP and UDP Socket API to