Attached here is a clean version, which will be archived.
Note that there was a lot of sidechat in IRC it is unclear how much of that
everyone in the room was aware of. I hope the minutes are a pretty accurate
record now, but if people feel otherwise I hope they say so.
I'll link this version
I haven't tested this out to see if it dispatches all the correct events in
order to be spec-compliant but Chromium just landed programmatic
copy-and-cut [with restrictions that require that there is an active,
expanded Selection/Range in the Document]:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 4:32 PM, James M. Greene james.m.gre...@gmail.com
wrote:
They used `Document#queryCommandSupported` and
`Document#queryCommandEnabled` for feature detection -- the latter
requiring that there is an active, expanded Selection/Range in the Document
in order to get a
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28560
Bug ID: 28560
Summary: [Shadow] investigate if there should be
deepRelatedTarget and touch.deepTarget
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
I think Polymer folks will answer the use case of re-distribution.
So let me just show a good analogy so that every one can understand
intuitively what re-distribution *means*.
Let me use a pseudo language and define XComponent's constructor as follows:
XComponents::XComponents(Title text, Icon
I think using ::host pseudo element can avoid this kind of
*controversial* discussion and we can get benefits from that.
+1 for ::host pseudo element.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 4:02 AM Daniel Tan li...@novalistic.com wrote:
On 4/26/2015 12:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I don't understand why
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:56 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
For :host it's less interesting, but I thought a major use of
:host() and :host-context() is to be able to write selectors that
have combinators to the right of :host() or :host-context().
Would they match against
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28561
Bug ID: 28561
Summary: [Shadow]: rename content to slot
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28562
Bug ID: 28562
Summary: [Shadow]: Introduce deep tree terminology
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28552
Bug 28552 depends on bug 20144, which changed state.
Bug 20144 Summary: [Shadow]: Add closed flag to createShadowRoot
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20144
What|Removed |Added
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27325
Bug 27325 depends on bug 20144, which changed state.
Bug 20144 Summary: [Shadow]: Add closed flag to createShadowRoot
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20144
What|Removed |Added
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28445
Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Tan li...@novalistic.com wrote:
My guess is it's because a shadow host element is an element, not a
pseudo-element.
I think a pseudo-element makes more sense as it represents an
element/box not accessible within the tree, whereas a pseudo-class
represents
On Saturday 2015-04-25 09:32 -0700, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I don't understand why :host is a pseudo-class rather than a
pseudo-element. My mental model of a pseudo-class is that it allows
you to match an element based on a boolean internal slot of that
element. :host is not that since e.g. *
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:37 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
We haven't really used (in the sense of shipping across browsers)
pseudo-elements before for things that are both tree-like (i.e., not
::first-letter, ::first-line, or ::selection) and not leaves of the
tree. (Gecko
On Monday 2015-04-27 05:49 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:37 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
We haven't really used (in the sense of shipping across browsers)
pseudo-elements before for things that are both tree-like (i.e., not
::first-letter,
16 matches
Mail list logo