Hi Art, All,
Unfortunately I won't be able to attend today's call but would like to
provide feedback on some of the discussions from last week's call.
On the addition to R11, specifically:
A conforming specification SHALL specify that if none of the signatures
and certificate chains can be
Hi All,
Marcos, Frederick and I met with Thomas at the recent W3C Security
workshop and were able to answer the questions that I had put forward
following the face-to-face discussion with the XML Security working
group in Mandelieu.
In short we agreed:
1. DSA-SHA256 will be specified as a
[mailto:frederick.hir...@nokia.com]
Sent: 07 January 2009 18:36
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps; Thomas Roessler
Subject: Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
Mark
Some more discussion inline, thanks for taking the time to review.
Do you mind updating the draft
Hi All,
In the current Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration specification
[1], the window modes feature is identified as being at risk. Vodafone
believes that window modes are an important feature and should be
supported in Widgets 1.0. This email provides a proposal for how modes
could be
Hi Arve,
Thanks for your feedback - I'm glad our thinking is along similar lines.
Some responses to your comments below.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Arve Bersvendsen [mailto:ar...@opera.com]
Sent: 20 January 2009 20:53
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; public-webapps
Subject
Hi Marcos, Art, All,
Please find below Vodafone's comments on the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and
Configuration specification. I have divided them into what I consider to
be substantive comments and editorial comments.
Thanks,
Mark
We share Yoan's concerns.
In addition believe that in lots of cases most of the content (in the broadest
sense) will be the same between modes and only the presentation will need to be
changed. In cases in which the content is different, we feel this would be
better addressed
Hi All,
Closing the action 291
(http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/291) please find below a
strawman for a set of requirements relating to widget
(view/display/window) modes. I have tried to define the requirements
without basing them on any of the technical solutions that have been
, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps
Subject: Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of
Widgets 1.0: Packaging Configuration spec
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
mark.priest...@vodafone.com wrote:
Hi Marcos, Art, All,
Please find
Having discussed this internally and gone through some examples we agree
with the issue identified by Josh. In addition, concerns were raised
that even without the prospect of authors forking html to create
localised content - which we agree is highly undesirable, debugging
localised widgets could
3. Signature handling should be specified in [Widgets-DigSig], thus,
replace all of Step 5 in section 8.2 with the following:
[[
The algorithm that describes how to process the list of signatures
created in step 4 is defined in [Widgets-DigSig].
]]
And add the processing model
Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 February 2009 17:35
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps
Subject: Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of
Widgets 1.0: Packaging Configuration spec
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6
-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: Dienstag, 27. Januar 2009 11:56
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital
Signatures - the Usage property
Hi Mark
Message-
From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hir...@nokia.com]
Sent: 04 February 2009 20:53
To: ext Thomas Roessler
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston);
Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; ext Marcos Caceres; public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets
then I
think we should address it.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 February 2009 13:27
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston); public-webapps
Subject: Re: Reminder: January 31
Hi Marcos, All,
I think we're all roughly on the same page about potential changes to
the localisation model and should therefore be able to specify something
that keeps everyone happy. I'll try and illustrate using an example.
Widget resource is localised, with the following file structure:
Hi All,
Below is a copy of the proposal that I sent to Frederick and Marcos
following last week's WebApp call to capture the agreements that were
reached in regards to defining different signature roles.
I'm reposting to the public list to provide background to the updates to
that Widgets
Hi All,
In response to:
Action #224 - Work with Marcos to flesh out the details of the
processing model for multiple signatures; Mark and Marcos -
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/224
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/224
I have outlined two alternative approaches to
://bondi.omtp.org/Documents/CR10/BONDI_Architecture_Security_Task_CR
10.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 February 2009 17:35
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps
Subject: Re: Reminder: January 31 comment
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com
[mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: 22 February 2009 16:59
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] Action #224 - Work with Marcos to flesh
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com
[mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: 22 February 2009 16:02
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] The access element
Many thanks for the feedback - comments inline.
Regards,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: timeless.b...@gmail.com [mailto:timeless.b...@gmail.com]
On Behalf Of timeless
Sent: 21 February 2009 18:28
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] A revised proposal
...
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hir...@nokia.com]
Sent: 27 February 2009 13:19
To: marc...@opera.com
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps@w3.org WG; Priestley,
Mark, VF-Group
Subject: Re: [widgets] Digsig optimization
Marcos
Yes, logically
Hi Frederick, All,
Some comments on the updated specification but first let me again say
thanks for doing a great job making all the changes!
---
Substantive comments
---
3
Implementers are encouraged to provide mechanisms to enable end-users
to
considerations text Mark mentioned?
Thanks
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:53 PM, ext Priestley, Mark, VF-Group wrote:
Hi Frederick, All,
Some comments on the updated specification but first let me
again say
thanks for doing a great job making all the changes
Thanks Thomas (and also Marcin from an earlier email) for the
explanation.
I support Thomas' suggested changes.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:t...@w3.org]
Sent: 16 March 2009 11:18
To: Frederick Hirsch
Cc: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; ext Marcos Caceres; WebApps
Hi Marcos, All,
I would like to raise a comment in support of making the configuration
document at the root of the widget mandatory.
The localisation model currently described by [1] allows for multiple
configuration documents; zero or one at the root of the widget and zero
or one at the root
Looks good to me - thanks Frederick and Marcos!
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Hirsch
Sent: 18 March 2009 21:03
To: WebApps WG
Cc: Frederick Hirsch
From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hir...@nokia.com]
Sent: 18 March 2009 20:34
To: WebApps WG
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; Marcos Caceres
Subject: [widget-digsig] proposed change to 7.1, common
constraints, for algorithms
implementers :(
-Original Message-
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com
[mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: 19 March 2009 14:25
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
On Thu
Hi All,
As the author signature was something I had a hand in creating let me add my 2
pence worth.
Rainer is correct in that the author signature need not actually come from the
author of the widget. It comes from someone who claims to be the widget's
author. Whether you believe this claim
Hi Art, All,
Please find below my editorial comments and requests for clarifications
based on the new WD [1]. While it is a long list the comments are all
minor and so hopefully easily addressed. Overall I think the spec is
looking good, for which a lot of thanks must go to Frederick and Marcos!
.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 21:57
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston); Web Applications
Working Group WG
Subject: Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime
Dear All,
I have a number of comments against the Created property.
As previously communicated on conference calls (although I can't find
the relevant minutes) Vodafone objects to the mandatory use of the
Created property. The main objection is that on mobile devices the user
often does not
+1
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arve Bersvendsen
Sent: 16 April 2009 13:17
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: [Widgets AE] Removing show() and hide()
The show() and hide() methods from the Widgets AE
Vodafone supports the proposal to drop screenshots from v1 of the
Widgets specifications.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: 18 April 2009 15:21
To: ext Marcos Caceres
Cc:
Cc: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widget] [widget-digsig] Comment on WD of Widgets 1.0:
Digital Signatures - use of Created property
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Frederick Hirsch
frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
if there is no need for the Created property
Thanks Frederick and Marcos - responses inline.
Only a couple of questions left :)
Regards,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Marcos Caceres
Sent: 22 April 2009 11:46
To: Frederick Hirsch; Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
+1 for Art's shorter counter proposal
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Marcos Caceres
Sent: 23 April 2009 07:47
To: Arthur Barstow
Cc: Marcos Caceres; Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; Hirsch Frederick
(Nokia-CIC
: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hir...@nokia.com]
Sent: 23 April 2009 13:20
To: ext David Rogers
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; marc...@opera.com; Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; Web
Applications Working Group WG; Babbage, Steve, VF-Group
Subject: Re: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations
I would like to see some text cautioning authors not to rely on this
algorithm, since it is optional in user agents.
Agreed - in fact I think a general statement about use of optional algorithms
would be beneficial
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
Hi Art, All,
Vodafone has some late comments which it would like to provide to the
group for consideration and apologise for supplying these after the
deadline.
We believe that all but one of the comments is editorial and so there
inclusion or otherwise should not affect or delay the decision to
Hi Art,
Vodafone supports this proposal.
I have submitted some late (sorry!) editorial comments (see separate
email) but do not believe any other comments were received or that the
comments I submitted should hold up this process.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From:
43 matches
Mail list logo
