On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:00:11 +0300, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
wrote:
Hi Art,
Can you update the Webapps Publication Status page to add Eduardo as
co-editor of the Push API draft?
Done - you should be able to do it yourselves actually, using your normal
W3C login credentials.
We are looking for
TL;DR: I disagree with the reasoning but I reach the same conclusion:
window.CSS is worth trying.
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:57:01 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr.
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Chaals McCathieNevile
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:03:19 +0200, Cameron McCormack
Chaals McCathieNevile
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:20:34 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
I support (as an individual
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:46:00 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, "Chaals McCathieNevile" On
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com)> wrote:
> > Based on
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:03:19 +0200, Cameron McCormack
wrote:
Chaals McCathieNevile:
Frankly, I am deeply sceptical that the CSS group has managed to solve
the social problem sufficiently well to make the technical solution
noticeably different from hasFeature.
I think the biggest
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:06 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov
wrote:
That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components
work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of
honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just encourage people to
listen to that?
I suspect th
TL;DR: Conway's law is already validated in this instance, but maybe
there's no real harm, and stuff to like about the proposal anyway. On
balance I think it is a good idea. (Plus a lot of stuff about @supports
...)
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 01:59:28 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr.
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:47:22 +0200, Florian Bösch wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
There is no conceivable conformance checker that's going to allow the
use of completely arbitrary tag names. It doesn't matter what formalism
it uses.
To allow custom tag name
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:53:06 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Aug 9, 2012, at 02:28 , Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/8/12 8:23 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
If we're telling people to use that pattern, we might as well just not
prefix the API in the first place because that pattern just tells the
web develop
is we
start a new CfC.
Works for me. Marcos, should I just send you a snippet for references?
cheers
-Thanks, AB
On 7/26/12 9:52 AM, ext Chaals McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:17:42 +0200, Marcos Caceres
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 at 19:02, Chaals McCathieNevile wrote
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:17:42 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 at 19:02, Chaals McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com)>
wrote:
> Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommend
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
Currently I object. I would
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:52:06 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Kornel Lesi�~Dski wrote:
However, I'm afraid that the most common implementation (aside from
complete lack of error recovery) will be a simple as 30-second retry
interval and that won't be very DoS-safe. UAs can do be
Hi all,
after today I will no longer be working for Opera. I will remain chair of
web-apps as an invited expert.
After a break I will be working for Yandex, the Russian search and
services company...
cheers
Chaals
--
Chaals - standards declaimer
14 matches
Mail list logo
