One feature I'd like to see is respect for compression headers. I've got an
app which results in a 30Mb app cache, but it's only 8Mb over the wire due
to GZIP compression. I'd much prefer the appcache to see that the content
was served compressed, cache it compressed, and serve it to the browser
Have you heard of knockout.js? It's an MVVM pattern based on JQuery, if
you're not aware of it you may be interested to see their approach.
Official site:
http://knockoutjs.com/
Recent MIX event:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MIX/MIX11/FRM08
Just FYI as it was related...
On 23 April 2011
I agree that it'd be best to have a spec independent of database platform,
which is why I was asking about an idea along the lines of RelationalDB
https://github.com/keean/RelationalDBor the example I gave in the email
which initiated this discussion, both of which are entirely abstracted from
the
.
On 31 March 2011 15:19, Nathan Kitchen w...@nathankitchen.com wrote:
Hi.
I've been watching discussions on IndexedDB for a while now, and wondered
if anyone would mind spending a few moments to explain how IndexedDB is
related (or not) to WebSQL. Is IndexedDB seen as replacing
A couple of other app cache observations from a hobbyist who's played around
with Google's Gears...
I built an offline web application based on Gears, with the intention to
migrate to something a bit more standardized as it became available. That
was a good two years ago now, but the existing and
I'm also a little confused. There was a recent announcement [1] from the
WHATWG that the version number was being dropped from HTML 5. This has been
reported elsewhere, usually directly referring back to the WHATWG
announcement [2].
Obviously this doesn't seem to fit with the smacking great 5 in
Not sure if this is covered by index keys, but you may consider adding:
- Full-text indexing
To the agenda.
N
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I suspect internationalization is another thing where we can quickly
make progress so lets try to get to
I've been keeping up with the work you guys have been doing for a while and
I like the direction that the current spec is headed in. Although it ended
up being a bit of a dud, Google's Gears project got some cool functionality
out for developers to feed back on. The most obvious problem was that
.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com wrote:
Hi Nathan,
On 27 October 2010 08:58, Nathan Kitchen w...@nathankitchen.com wrote:
The most obvious problem was that it was tied so tightly to SQLite (which
I think everyone would be amazed if MS started shipping with IE10
the spec and encourage
them take up their complaint with the vendors instead.
Cheers.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Nathan Kitchen w...@nathankitchen.comwrote:
Hi all.
Stumbled across this article on Ars Technica
Hi all.
Stumbled across this article on Ars Technica regarding the abuse of the
WebSQL spec. I thought I'd share it here for a couple of reasons:
1. Someone might want to point out that it's part of the Offline Storage
Spec, not strictly HTML5.
2. Security implications may inform some
Hi.
Just wondering if anyone could take a few moments to provide an update on
the state of full-text indexing in IndexedDB?
A quick google indicated that the question had been raised before, Jeremy
Orlow suggesting support for inverted indexes (back in February) and there
was a reference to
Hi all.
Disclaimer: last time I posted to this mailing list someone correctly
pointed out that I'd not read the spec properly. Apologies if I've
done the same again. I'm very enthusiastic about the whole offline web
app thing, and as this is a public forum I thought I may as well fire
off a
Hi all.
I have a query/suggestion regarding the current spec for IndexedDB.
Currently there doesn't appear to be any specific way to check
existence of things like indexes and object stores. One scenario this
may be important could be a site which allows optional offline
functionality, for
That would do the trick, yes. Thanks for pointing it out, all my w3
spec reading skills are belong to you.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Shawn Wilsher sdwi...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 7/5/2010 3:19 AM, Nathan Kitchen wrote:
There are a couple of ways to do this:
I think you missed one
15 matches
Mail list logo
