On 03/12/2012 06:02 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:10:19 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK
wrote:
The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly
wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to
enable support of use cases such as
Sorry, posted to wrong list. Please disregard. Stefan
On 03/09/2012 04:01 PM, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:
Hi all,
regarding Action-32 (http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/track/actions/32)
I have sent this mail to public-webapps:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/1077
Hi all,
regarding Action-32 (http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/track/actions/32)
I have sent this mail to public-webapps:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/1077.html
Unless there are objections, I will close this action.
Note that there has come one follow up quest
The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly
wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to
enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain
scenarios the resource use (e.g. power) is very important.
However, this kind of function
On 02/23/2012 12:58 AM, Feras Moussa wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Hakansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 4:50 AM
To: Feras Moussa
Cc: Travis Leithead; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: StreamBuilder threshold
On 01/26/2012 07:05
Message----- From: Stefan Hakansson LK
[mailto:stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com] Sent: Tuesday, January
17, 2012 12:28 AM To: Feras Moussa; Travis Leithead Cc:
public-webapps@w3.org Subject: StreamBuilder threshold
I'm looking at
http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/streamsapi/, and
spe
I'm looking at http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/streamsapi/,
and specifically at the StreamBuilder.
It has the possibility to generate an event if the data available falls
below a threshold. How is this supposed to work if there is more than
one consumer, and those consumers either
On 12/23/2011 06:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi All,
I've been thinking a bit about realistic expectations for 2012 for those
specs that are already in scope in the WG's current charter (complete
spec list is at [PubStatus]).
Below is a list (in alphabetical order) of what I consider the WG's