Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I believe this actually is - or at
least touches upon - several questions in disguise:
.) Do we want to allow decoration of elements that are already in the DOM
tree?
- which is for all intents and purposes a corollary of:
.) Do we allow calling of new
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Roland Steiner
rolandstei...@google.com wrote:
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I believe this actually is - or at
least touches upon - several questions in disguise:
.) Do we want to allow decoration of elements that are already in the DOM
tree?
If by
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org
wrote:
All,
Adam raises an interesting question: should we allow
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Erik Arvidsson
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
Also -- we can always try to start with just one subtree, and then
enable multiple. Since the plumbing and the order specification are
trivial, it's something we can easily add.
:DG
Yes. This sounds like a good
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:44, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
What do you think?
+1
It would surely allow certain use cases to be covered that are not
covered today with form control elements.
How about not throwing on new ShadowTree(element) and just append a
new shadow root
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:44, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
What do you think?
+1
It would surely allow certain use cases to be covered that are not
covered today with form control elements.
How
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:44, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
What do you think?
+1
It would surely allow certain use cases
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
All,
Adam raises an interesting question: should we allow more than one
shadow DOM subtree per element?
Background: per current design
(http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Component_Model#Encapsulation), you can
only
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org
wrote:
All,
Adam raises an interesting question: should we allow more than one
shadow DOM subtree per element?
Background: per current design
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:44, Dimitri Glazkov
Also -- we can always try to start with just one subtree, and then
enable multiple. Since the plumbing and the order specification are
trivial, it's something we can easily add.
:DG
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM,
12 matches
Mail list logo
