Re: RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:17 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: >> Gecko does not implement the IDBSync APIs, and >> I don't think that is likely to change in the >> next few months. > > > From: "Israel Hilerio" > >> IE is not planning on

Re: RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-29 Thread Odin Hørthe Omdal
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:17 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: > Gecko does not implement the IDBSync APIs, and > I don't think that is likely to change in the > next few months. From: "Israel Hilerio" > IE is not planning on implementing the IDBSync > APIs for IE10 and we proposed to mark them > "

Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-28 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote: > > From: "Jonas Sicking" > > I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one > > exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on > > the list needs to be edited into the spec. > > > > Apart from that we ha

RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-28 Thread Israel Hilerio
IE is not planning on implementing the IDBSync APIs for IE10 and we proposed to mark them “At Risk” on the current spec. Israel On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:17 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joshua Bell mailto:jsb...@chromium.org>> wrote: Are there implementations of

Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-28 Thread Kyle Huey
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joshua Bell wrote: > Are there implementations of the IDB*Sync APIs for Workers? > Gecko does not implement the IDBSync APIs, and I don't think that is likely to change in the next few months. - Kyle

Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-28 Thread Joshua Bell
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote: > > From: "Jonas Sicking" > > I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one > > exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on > > the list needs to be edited into the spec. > > > > Apart from that we

Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-28 Thread Odin Hørthe Omdal
> From: "Jonas Sicking"   > I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one > exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on > the list needs to be edited into the spec. > > Apart from that we have a number of fairly minor uncontroversial fixes > (details around

Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

2012-02-28 Thread Jonas Sicking
I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on the list needs to be edited into the spec. Apart from that we have a number of fairly minor uncontroversial fixes (details around generators, order in objectStore/inde