On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
I still want to know: Why would a program want to know the object's
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
I still want to know: Why would a program want to know the object's
[[Class]]?
It shouldn't, but [[Class]]es are exposed by ECMAScript
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
I still want to know: Why would a program want to know the object's
[[Class]]?
It shouldn't, but [[Class]]es are exposed by ECMAScript objects in their
toString() method and thus if
Ian Hickson:
I don't really mind exactly what the solution is; my only concern here
would be that I'd be throwing [PrototypeRoot] around a lot.
Acknowledged. If you can propose a way of defining this without needing
to use [PrototypeRoot] a lot, that’d help.
(I assume with PrototypeRoot
On 6/20/09, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Ian Hickson:
I don't really mind exactly what the solution is; my only concern here
would be that I'd be throwing [PrototypeRoot] around a lot.
Acknowledged. If you can propose a way of defining this without needing
to use [PrototypeRoot
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Ian Hickson:
I don't really mind exactly what the solution is; my only concern here
would be that I'd be throwing [PrototypeRoot] around a lot.
Acknowledged. If you can propose a way of defining this without needing
to use [PrototypeRoot
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
I still want to know: Why would a program want to know the object's
[[Class]]?
It shouldn't, but [[Class]]es are exposed by ECMAScript objects in their
toString() method and thus if we want to ensure universally consistent
behaviour we have to
Cameron McCormack:
Done:
The value of the internal [[Class]] property of a host object is
determined as follows:
* If the host object implements a single interface, then the value
of the internal [[Class]] property MUST be the identifier of
that interface.
Ian
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Done:
The value of the internal [[Class]] property of a host object is
determined as follows:
* If the host object implements a single interface, then the value
of
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Done:
The value of the internal [[Class]] property of a host object is
determined as follows:
* If the host object implements a single interface, then the value
of the internal [[Class]] property MUST be the identifier of
Ian Hickson:
In that case I would like us to do this (specifically, define [[Class]]
for objects that have only one non-[NoPrototypeObject] interface), since
that's the majority of them, and it would be better than having to
sprinkle [PrototypeRoot] all over the place.
Done:
The value
11 matches
Mail list logo
