On Aug 3, 2011, at 07:48 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> At Apple we have a somewhat lengthy internal process for joining new Working
> Groups, so if feedback has to go to a new WG's list, you will likely miss out
> on Apple feedback for at least a few months.
Is the hold-up over "feedback has to
On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:21 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:37:31 +0200, Arthur Barstow
> wrote:
>> The From-Origin spec is WebApps'; it is _not_ a joint deliverable with the
>> proposed WebAppSec WG.
>
> I assumed it was because of "Secure Cross-Domain Framing" and the signif
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:37:31 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
The From-Origin spec is WebApps'; it is _not_ a joint deliverable with
the proposed WebAppSec WG.
I assumed it was because of "Secure Cross-Domain Framing" and the
significant overlap.
I discussed this with Thomas on IRC (not log
On Aug 2, 2011, at 4:10 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:53:49 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>> Well, groups can decide to stop working on a deliverable without having to
>> recharter; further, we've had separate groups work on joint deliverables in
>> the past. In practi
On 8/2/11 8:20 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:10:25 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
Can we at least make it so that public-webapps@w3.org stays the list
for technical discussion on CORS? We already switched mailing lists
once (twice if you count going from the initial
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:10:25 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
Can we at least make it so that public-webapps@w3.org stays the list for
technical discussion on CORS? We already switched mailing lists once
(twice if you count going from the initial proposal on
public-web...@w3.org to public-a
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:53:49 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Well, groups can decide to stop working on a deliverable without having
to recharter; further, we've had separate groups work on joint
deliverables in the past. In practical terms, the minimum that webapps
needs to do is to give it
On Aug 1, 2011, at 20:05 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>>> Joint deliverable seems even worse than moving it.
>>
>> The goal of making this a joint deliverable is to preserve the patent
>> commitments out of webapps. This was a concern that cam
On Jul 15, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 16:47 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:43:13 +0200, Arthur Barstow
>> wrote:
>>> As indicated a year ago [1] and again at the end of last month [2], the
>>> proposal to create a new Web Application
On Jul 15, 2011, at 16:47 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:43:13 +0200, Arthur Barstow
> wrote:
>> As indicated a year ago [1] and again at the end of last month [2], the
>> proposal to create a new Web Application Security WG has moved forward with
>> a formal AC review now
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:43:13 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
As indicated a year ago [1] and again at the end of last month [2], the
proposal to create a new Web Application Security WG has moved forward
with a formal AC review now underway and ending August 19.
The proposed charter includes
As indicated a year ago [1] and again at the end of last month [2], the
proposal to create a new Web Application Security WG has moved forward
with a formal AC review now underway and ending August 19.
The proposed charter includes making CORS and UMP a joint deliverable
between the WebApps an
12 matches
Mail list logo
