On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no
objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
specification to encourage broader review and comments.
Sorry, I'm in the
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:01:17 +0200, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were
no
objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were
no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
specification to encourage broader review and comments.
-AB
On 6/30/11 6:46 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
As Cameron indicated in [1], all
As Cameron indicated in [1], all non-enhancements bugs for Web IDL are
now resolved and as such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last
Call Working Draft of Web IDL:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's
decision to
