On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:01:17 +0200, timeless wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were
no
objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
specification to encourage broader review
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no
> objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
> specification to encourage broader review and comments.
Sorry, I'm in the midst of sending com
Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were
no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
specification to encourage broader review and comments.
-AB
On 6/30/11 6:46 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
As Cameron indicated in [1], all non-enhancem
As Cameron indicated in [1], all non-enhancements bugs for Web IDL are
now resolved and as such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last
Call Working Draft of Web IDL:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
decision to
