Re: CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline July 7

2011-07-10 Thread timeless
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC specification to encourage broader review and comments. Sorry, I'm in the

Re: CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline July 7

2011-07-10 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:01:17 +0200, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC

Re: CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline July 7

2011-07-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC specification to encourage broader review and comments. -AB On 6/30/11 6:46 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: As Cameron indicated in [1], all

CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline July 7

2011-06-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
As Cameron indicated in [1], all non-enhancements bugs for Web IDL are now resolved and as such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's decision to