RE: Accessibility requirement

2008-08-01 Thread Cynthia Shelly
ginal Message- From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:50 PM To: Arthur Barstow Cc: Cynthia Shelly; public-webapps Subject: Re: Accessibility requirement On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcos, Cynthi

Re: Accessibility requirement

2008-07-30 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcos, Cynthia, > > Perhaps requirement #37 as currently written [1] is overly prescriptive. > > For example, rather than trying to enumerate the sub-requirements for the > other language (i.e. the non-HTML language), th

Re: Accessibility requirement

2008-07-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:50 AM To: Cynthia Shelly Cc: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Accessibility requirement On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Cynthia Shelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Interesting... My experience has been that HTML 4.01 can be made

RE: Accessibility requirement

2008-07-21 Thread Cynthia Shelly
es [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:50 AM To: Cynthia Shelly Cc: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Accessibility requirement On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Cynthia Shelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interesting... > My experience has been that HTML 4.01 can

Re: Accessibility requirement

2008-07-15 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Cynthia Shelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interesting... > My experience has been that HTML 4.01 can be made accessible if it is > carefully coded. WCAG 2.0 has many >techniques for this, including for > scripted and styled content. While it is true than many

Re: Accessibility requirement

2008-07-14 Thread Cynthia Shelly
Marcos said "the reason we have "should" and "may" is to accommodate HTML, which is not as accessible as it could be. To have "must" would mean that HTML4.01 could not meet the requirement." Interesting... My experience has been that HTML 4.01 can be made accessible if it is carefully coded. WC

Re: Accessibility requirement

2008-07-14 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Cynthia, On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Cynthia Shelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I'm a member of wai-pf and wcag, and met some of you at the web apps face to > face in redmond recently. I was reading through the widgets 1.0 requirements > spec, and came across this accessibility