On 2/17/13 10:34 AM, ext Miko Nieminen wrote:
So far I haven't got other feedback than this is fairly good idea and
probably should be included in the official API, but is it
stillpossible to get this kind of changes included in the API or am I
too late with this request? If it is possible to
Asking my previous question again.
There has been some discussions in www-tag list about IndexedDB API as an
addition to discussion happening here. At www-tag, I was instructed to
return back to this list with my question.
There seems to be worry over IDB that it is too low level API and too
I have read this complains to the API before and I have to admit that
it doesn't seems difficult to me too, but the fact is that I'm
studying a computers degree and also have worked before with AppEngine
storage... :-P But I must to admit that the IndexedDB primitives are
too primitives and would
