Cc'ed to SVG as well, since people there use progress events. Please reply
to the Web Apps group (reply-to is set).
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:45:10 +0200, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress
Hear hear!
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Hi,
Lachy thinks the latest editor's draft[1] is ready for Last Call, after
responding to all the comments from last time (and removing the
NSResolver). The disposition of comments[2] explains what happened to
those comments.
So this is a call
Kartikaya Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:06:23 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So this is a call for Consensus to publish the Editor's Draft [1] of the
Selectors API spec as a Last Call. Please respond before Monday November
10. As always,
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:31:50 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
We have previously discussed a stalled event, in the context of
suggested timing for producing progress events. We decided not to set a
specific timing, because the use
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
I think it also makes sense to add a note that conforming specs and uesr
agents *should* use the events defined rather than something else with
equivalent functionality. I'm not sure it makes sense to make that a
*must*.
I think it
Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:06:23 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/ [2]
Is it just me or is the scope element somewhat under-defined in the
spec? The only mentions of it are in this sentence:
If the
Stewart Brodie wrote:
1) What is the scope element for - it's only mentioned in one sentence?
That statement has now been commented out (see my previous mail [1])
2) Is an empty string actually a valid selector? If not, then the whole
null/undefined is an empty string discussion is
I support the publication as Last Call.
On Oct 31, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Hi,
Lachy thinks the latest editor's draft[1] is ready for Last Call,
after responding to all the comments from last time (and removing
the NSResolver). The disposition of comments[2]
Charles McCathieNevile:
So this is a call for Consensus to publish the Editor's Draft [1] of the
Selectors API spec as a Last Call. Please respond before Monday November
10. As always, silence is taken as assent but an explicit response is
preferred.
I’m in favour of publishing.
A few
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:08:56 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
I agree. Not sure
10 matches
Mail list logo
