On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> We can't generically block on children since we can't let the main
>> window block on a child. That would effectively permit synchronous IO
>> from the main thread which is not someth
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
...
>>...
>>
>> But I'm also not very worried about small diff
Hi all,
The time of my quarterly release of “Standards for Web
Applications on Mobile” has come again; the
August 2012 edition of the document is now available at:
http://www.w3.org/2012/08/mobile-web-app-state/
I have also created a URI where the latest version of that document will
be available
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> The current draft of XHR2 doesn't allow clients to set the UA header.
>
Presumably, by "clients" you mean client-side script, and not "the [client]
implementation of the UA".
>
> That's unfortunate, because part of the intent of the UA
Web Applications Working Group,
Greetings. In a 2010 Scientific American article, Tim Berners-Lee indicated
some concerns about social networking websites. Concerns were expressed about
social networking websites which were described as "walled gardens". Concerns
indicated included that socia
On 9/5/12 11:16 AM, ext Adam Sobieski wrote:
Web Applications Working Group,
The subject matter of this mail list is the WG's specifications. Please
use this list accordingly.
If anyone wants to reply to Adam's e-mail, please use some other mail
list (such as www-t...@w3.org).
-Thanks, AB
David Grogan wrote:
Odin wrote:
Also, there's a much bigger chance of developers listening to error on
the opening page, rather than blocked.
+1. Replacing "blocked" event with an "error" event named BlockedError
would be an improvement.
I did this. Proposed patch to the spec is here:
Art Barstow, Thank you for indicating the www-t...@w3.org mailing list. I have
forwarded my email to that mailing list. Kind regards, Adam Sobieski> Date:
Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:47:21 -0400
> From: art.bars...@nokia.com
> To: adamsobie...@hotmail.com
> CC: public-webapps@w3.org
> Subject: Please d
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote:
> David Grogan wrote:
>
>> Odin wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, there's a much bigger chance of developers listening to error on
>>> the opening page, rather than blocked.
>>
>>
>> +1. Replacing "blocked" event with an "error" event named BlockedError
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Importantly, the sending side
>> doesn't have to know whether the receiving side is using a sync API to
>> receive it or not--in other words, that information doesn't have to be part
>> of the user's messaging protocol.
>
> I agree that this
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> [Constructor]
> interface MessageChannel {
> readonly attribute MessagePortSyncSide syncPort;
> readonly attribute MessagePortAsyncSide asyncPort;
> };
This should of course say SyncMessageChannel.
/ Jonas
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> The problem with a "Only allow blocking on children, except that
> window can't block on its children" is that you can never block on a
> computation which is implemented in the main thread. I think that cuts
> out some major use cases since
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> The problem with a "Only allow blocking on children, except that
>> window can't block on its children" is that you can never block on a
>> computation which is implemented in the mai
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:02 PM, b...@pettay.fi wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 08:31 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
The problem with a "Only allow blocking on children, except
On 09/06/2012 09:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:02 PM, b...@pettay.fi wrote:
On 09/06/2012 08:31 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
The problem with a "Only allow bloc
On 09/06/2012 09:30 AM, Olli Pettay wrote:
On 09/06/2012 09:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:02 PM, b...@pettay.fi wrote:
On 09/06/2012 08:31 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jonas Sicking w
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Olli Pettay wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 09:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:02 PM, b...@pettay.fi wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/06/2012 08:31 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>
>
>>>
On 09/06/2012 09:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Olli Pettay wrote:
On 09/06/2012 09:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:02 PM, b...@pettay.fi wrote:
On 09/06/2012 08:31 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Glenn Maynard
18 matches
Mail list logo
