I'm taking a back-channel discussion on-list per Anne's suggestion. We are
trying to clarify some text in section 4.6.1, The open() method which is
meant to describe how an XMLHttpRequest instance is associated with a specific
document. (This association is important for origin checks,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
hallv...@opera.com wrote:
This is quite convoluted, but precise. The last object could perhaps be
instance to make it clearer? However, my proposal is to move this text to
the constructor section (4.2 Constructors), for example
TheXHR Editors would like to publish a new WD of XHR and this is a
Call for Consensus to do so using the following ED (not yet using the
WD template) as the basis
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html.
Agreement to this proposal: a) indicates support for publishing a new
Let document be the document associated with the global object of the
XMLHttpRequest interface object.
You'd also need to check the JavaScript global environment.
Thanks for responding. How?
What I mean is that var-variables are scoped to the algorithm they
are used in. So you need
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
hallv...@opera.com wrote:
You'd also need to check the JavaScript global environment.
Thanks for responding. How?
Just like the spec does now?
What I mean is that var-variables are scoped to the algorithm they
are used in. So
If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please reply to
this e-mail by December 29 at the latest.
Putting my name as former editor while all the text is either written
by me or copied from me seems disingenuous.
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
[...]
It seemed easier to just make the change:
https://github.com/whatwg/xhr/commit/67244d007243de427ffe8367ed0a7c49d40be199
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:04:54 +0100, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
On 11/22/12 2:01 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
TheXHR Editors would like to publish a new WD of XHR and this is a
Call for Consensus to do so ...
Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20045
Bug ID: 20045
Summary: data: URLs, HTTP, and parsing
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
On 11/22/2012 02:01 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
TheXHR Editors would like to publish a new WD of XHR and this is a
Call for Consensus to do so using the following ED (not yet using the
WD template) as the basis
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html.
Agreement to this proposal:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/22/2012 02:01 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
TheXHR Editors would like to publish a new WD of XHR and this is a
Call for Consensus to do so using the following ED (not yet using the
WD template) as the basis
11 matches
Mail list logo
