Hi Daniel
While widgets were (unfortunately) not widely adopted, a few companies
(including mine) are using it and it does the job for many simple
issues. It's true that the complexity of the spec vs the service
provided was not really a good deal.
However, what you describe makes sense. I
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, JC Verdié wrote:
Hi Daniel
While widgets were (unfortunately) not widely adopted, a few companies
(including mine) are using it and it does the job for many simple
issues. It's true that the complexity of the spec vs the service
provided was
In my opinion, the current spec's complexity in relation to its feature
goal, is high. This doesn't mean it was a bad spec or deficient, it could
be due to a number of factors: different assumptions about what widgets
should do, packaging choices that existed before web apps gained steam, or
a
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22754
Bug ID: 22754
Summary: width:100%; height:100%;
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
Yesterday a few of us at mozilla went through the FileSystem API
proposal we previously sent [1] and tightened it up.
It was also pointed out that we should address multi-file locking too.
One of the options is
And here's an example:
// Copy the 1th byte of file1.bin to file2.bin
navigator.getFilesystem().then(function(root) {
return root.openWrite([file1.bin, file2.bin]);
}).then(function(handles) {
return handles[0].read(1);
}).then(function(buffer) {
return handles[1].write(buffer);
});
On
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22754
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan Varga jan.va...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
Yesterday a few of us at mozilla went through the FileSystem API
proposal we previously sent [1] and tightened it up.
It was also pointed
Adding something like inotify would also enable use cases like having
a worker synchronize a filesystem to a server. Other parts of the
application could simply access the filesystem directly and do
whatever modifications it wants. Those notifications will
automatically be noticed and
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:59:33 -0700, Daniel Buchner dan...@mozilla.com
wrote:
In my opinion, the current spec's complexity in relation to its feature
goal, is high.
I think it is pretty important to this discussion to understand what parts
of the widget framework you think bring complexity
2013/7/22 pira...@gmail.com pira...@gmail.com:
Adding something like inotify would also enable use cases like having
a worker synchronize a filesystem to a server. Other parts of the
application could simply access the filesystem directly and do
whatever modifications it wants. Those
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:59:33 -0700, Daniel Buchner dan...@mozilla.com
wrote:
In my opinion, the current spec's complexity in relation to its feature
goal, is high.
I think it is pretty important to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan Varga jan.va...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
Yesterday a few of us at mozilla went through the FileSystem API
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Janusz Majnert jmajn...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/22 pira...@gmail.com pira...@gmail.com:
Adding something like inotify would also enable use cases like having
a worker synchronize a filesystem to a server. Other parts of the
application could simply access the
14 matches
Mail list logo
