Hi Art, and all,
I believe we have enough review on the current editor's draft to publish
directly a CR. We don't need to do the extra WD step. If implementors or others
have additional comments, they can do so during the CR phase. So I propose that
we publish a CR directly.
Thanks.
—
xiaoqia
> From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiai...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 21:16
> To: Arthur Barstow
> Cc: public-webapps
> Subject: Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
>
> > On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per
> process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/.
This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR.
> If you have any comme
Hi All,
Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC
was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to:
1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per
process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The
draft WD is [2]
