23:20
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; marc...@opera.com; Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/
Boston);
public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec
published on March 31
I think the following items are fine and will add them to the spec:
Signing
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Frederick Hirsch
frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
Mark
Please find responses inline. Thanks for the review.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Apr 7, 2009, at 2:27 AM, ext Priestley, Mark, VF-Group wrote:
Hi Art, All,
Please find below
Two proposals based on Marcos comments
-
which MAY logically contain - if the configuration file is made
mandatory then the MAY should be a MUST
I think it is a MAY, others?
Technically, Mark is correct. But leave it as a MAY (or maybe drop MAY
altogether) because this spec does not
Cc: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston); public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published
on March 31
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Frederick Hirsch frederick.hir...@nokia.com
wrote:
Mark
Please find responses inline. Thanks for the review
: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: 22 April 2009 11:46
To: Frederick Hirsch; Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston); public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures
spec published
Hi Art, All,
Please find below my editorial comments and requests for clarifications
based on the new WD [1]. While it is a long list the comments are all
minor and so hopefully easily addressed. Overall I think the spec is
looking good, for which a lot of thanks must go to Frederick and Marcos!
