On 2012-02-21 21:32, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Mark Baker wrote:
I wish they did, consistently. See RFC 4288 (just media type) and
the registry itself (MIME media type)
http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/index.html. Plus
they're still routinely referred to as MIME types in many IETF
On Saturday, February 18, 2012, 7:02:45 PM, Anne wrote:
AvK On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:47:08 +0100, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net
AvK wrote:
Well, I think it's the duty of the W3C to use the vocabulary of the
people that define this kind of thing.
AvK FWIW, the duty of the W3C is to bring the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Chris Lilley ch...@w3.org wrote:
So just call it 'Internet Media Type' like the IETF and IANA do, and quit
quibbling.
An informative aside (previously called MIME type) can be added for folks
not up to speed.
That would be incorrect. It's still called the
* Mark Baker wrote:
I wish they did, consistently. See RFC 4288 (just media type) and
the registry itself (MIME media type)
http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/index.html. Plus
they're still routinely referred to as MIME types in many IETF
contexts, including the ietf-types list!
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote:
The correct term IMHO is (Internet) Media Type, so disambiguation is
possible.
I don't believe it's helpful to maintain different sets of terminology.
Use the official term, and when disambiguation is needed, it's
WHEN I registered a media-type on the ietf list I have been quite much hit as
the first comment one says media-type nowadays. And indeed MIME is meant for
email originally.
So I guess politically media-type is a requirement.
Should I dig for a formal requirement?
paul
Le 18 févr. 2012 à
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:15:28 +0100, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net
wrote:
WHEN I registered a media-type on the ietf list I have been quite much
hit as the first comment one says media-type nowadays. And indeed MIME
is meant for email originally.
So I guess politically media-type is a
WHEN I registered a media-type on the ietf list I have been quite much hit
as the first comment one says media-type
sorry for the capitalization
nowadays. And indeed MIME is meant for email originally.
So I guess politically media-type is a requirement.
Should I dig for a formal
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:47:08 +0100, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net
wrote:
WHEN I registered a media-type on the ietf list I have been quite much
hit as the first comment one says media-type
nowadays.
Well, on one hand it's probably polite and correct to let the group that
defines a
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:47:08 +0100, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net
wrote:
Well, I think it's the duty of the W3C to use the vocabulary of the
people that define this kind of thing.
FWIW, the duty of the W3C is to bring the web to its full potential, not
quibble over terminology.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo