Robin Berjon wrote:
On Nov 18, 2009, at 13:13 , Julian Reschke wrote:
Robin Berjon wrote:
...
Couldn't we just register a URN NID for this? It seems that one has to go
through fewer hurdles, and no matter how transient I believe that it's a useful
thing to identify.
...
Yes, that's possible a
On Nov 18, 2009, at 13:13 , Julian Reschke wrote:
Robin Berjon wrote:
>> ...
>> Couldn't we just register a URN NID for this? It seems that one has to go
>> through fewer hurdles, and no matter how transient I believe that it's a
>> useful thing to identify.
>> ...
>
> Yes, that's possible and p
Robin Berjon wrote:
...
Couldn't we just register a URN NID for this? It seems that one has to go
through fewer hurdles, and no matter how transient I believe that it's a useful
thing to identify.
...
Yes, that's possible and probably would cause less eyebrows being raised...
BR, Julian
On Nov 18, 2009, at 06:12 , Julian Reschke wrote:
> Arun Ranganathan wrote:
>> 3. We could not directly call out a URI scheme at all. The benefit of doing
>> this is we can specify *behavior* without actually getting into details
>> about the actual identifier scheme used. But, the chief reason
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:03:23 +0100, Arun Ranganathan
wrote:
1. We could coin a new scheme such as the originally proposed filedata:
scheme. This has the advantages of associating behavior (and semantics)
with a scheme, so that existing schemes aren't confused or co-opted
inappropriately.
Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
3. We could not directly call out a URI scheme at all. The benefit of
doing this is we can specify *behavior* without actually getting into
details about the actual identifier scheme used. But, the chief reason to
not
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> 3. We could not directly call out a URI scheme at all. The benefit of
>> doing this is we can specify *behavior* without actually getting into
>> details about the actual identifier scheme used. But, the chief reason to
>> not take this c
Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Is there a particular reason why a specific URI scheme needs to be
called out at all?
(there are other schemes that may be more flexible, for instance
because they allow using a UUID/String pair for identification).
This is a useful question to answer :)
I assume e