Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
Oracle supports the publishing of these two drafts. Nikunj On Aug 13, 2009, at 3:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new WDs of the XHR and XHR2 specs. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is August 18. -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: ext Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com Date: August 12, 2009 9:05:56 AM EDT To: WebApps WG public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Publishing XMLHttpRequest Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/op.uyjvz6x264w...@annevk-t60 The last XMLHttpRequest Working Draft was a Last Call Working Draft. As it turned out a number of changes had to be made again. Meanwhile HTML5 also got further along and integration with the event loop as well as the storage mutex was desired. These are now integrated. The Forms WG asked for a way to set the base URL independently of the Window object. This is now possible as a side effect of making XMLHttpRequest ready for Web Workers. Doug Schepers asked for separate headings for each interface member. This is now done as a side effect of making the two XMLHttpRequest drafts more alike. Given the number of changes it seems best to simply publish another Working Draft for now of both XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and see where that brings us. It would help if we have more implementations trying to seriously implement it so we could declare the draft more stable, but it seems we are not quite there yet. I'd like to request that we publish these two drafts: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/ If the chairs could wave their magic wand that'd be appreciated. Cheers, -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ Nikunj http://o-micron.blogspot.com
Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:23:10 +0200, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote: The copyright year probably needs to be bumped up to 2009 for both drafts. Fixed. Also, XHR2 references the XHR document as “The XMLHttpRequest Object”, but it seems to have been renamed to just “XMLHttpRequest”. Fixed. I think it looks slightly strange to have code in the h1, though. Removed. I'm personally also in favor of publishing by the way. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new WDs of the XHR and XHR2 specs. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is August 18. Nokia supports these publications. -Regards, Art Barstow
Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
I support this. / Jonas On Thursday, August 13, 2009, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new WDs of the XHR and XHR2 specs. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is August 18. -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: ext Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com Date: August 12, 2009 9:05:56 AM EDT To: WebApps WG public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Publishing XMLHttpRequest Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/op.uyjvz6x264w...@annevk-t60 The last XMLHttpRequest Working Draft was a Last Call Working Draft. As it turned out a number of changes had to be made again. Meanwhile HTML5 also got further along and integration with the event loop as well as the storage mutex was desired. These are now integrated. The Forms WG asked for a way to set the base URL independently of the Window object. This is now possible as a side effect of making XMLHttpRequest ready for Web Workers. Doug Schepers asked for separate headings for each interface member. This is now done as a side effect of making the two XMLHttpRequest drafts more alike. Given the number of changes it seems best to simply publish another Working Draft for now of both XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and see where that brings us. It would help if we have more implementations trying to seriously implement it so we could declare the draft more stable, but it seems we are not quite there yet. I'd like to request that we publish these two drafts: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/ If the chairs could wave their magic wand that'd be appreciated. Cheers, -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
Arthur Barstow: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new WDs of the XHR and XHR2 specs. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is August 18. +1 for publishing. The copyright year probably needs to be bumped up to 2009 for both drafts. Also, XHR2 references the XHR document as “The XMLHttpRequest Object”, but it seems to have been renamed to just “XMLHttpRequest”. I think it looks slightly strange to have code in the h1, though. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
