Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-30 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote: I know we had this conversation before, and I'm not even sure which side of the issue I was on at the time, but given the amount of confusion at the TPAC meeting yesterday, I think we should consider renaming the Web Database spec. It seems clear

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-26 Thread Nikunj R. Mehta
On Nov 25, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote: On Nov 24, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: Based on the responses for this call for comments, I see the next

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-25 Thread Nikunj R. Mehta
On Nov 24, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: Based on the responses for this call for comments, I see the next steps as: 1. Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers - ready for LCWD publication. Later today I will begin a CfC to

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-25 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.comwrote: On Nov 24, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: Based on the responses for this call for comments, I see the next steps as: 1. Server-sent Events, Web Storage and

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-24 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: Based on the responses for this call for comments, I see the next steps as: 1. Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers - ready for LCWD publication. Later today I will begin a CfC to publish LCWD of these three specs 2. Web Sockets API

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: As noted on 23 October [1], the following HTML5 APIs are ready or very close to being ready for Last Call Working Draft (LC): 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web Database

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-05 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I know we had this conversation before, and I'm not even sure which side of

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I know we had this conversation before, and I'm not even sure which side of the issue I was on at the time, but given the

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November

2009-11-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I know we had this conversation before, and I'm not even sure which side of the issue I was on at the time, but given the amount of confusion at the TPAC meeting yesterday, I think we should