SSL.com vote YES.
csk
On 8/20/2018 9:11 AM, Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public wrote:
I didn’t receive any further updates to this ballot by the end of the
discussion period, so the voting period for this ballot is formally
opened. It concludes at 0900 UTC on Monday, 27 August.
Oh, and
On 20/8/2018 5:11 μμ, Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public wrote:
I didn’t receive any further updates to this ballot by the end of the
discussion period, so the voting period for this ballot is formally
opened. It concludes at 0900 UTC on Monday, 27 August.
Oh, and Cisco votes YES on ballot
As part of our plan to move Server Certificate Working Group messages to their
own mailing list starting Sept. 1 (and to refresh our mailing lists generally),
all Members, Associate Members, and organization Interested Parties must
provide a list of representatives who have posting rights on
Vulnerability is different from key compromise. Replacing all the heartbleed
certificates within 24 hours would have been a huge fire drill. It’s important
to get them replaced as quickly as possible, but mandatory revocations within
24 hours is going to make things worse, not better.
Tim,
I agree that Vulnerability is different from key compromise and the actions we
take should reflect that and I think we should try to keep 12 and 13 type
events in the 5-day list.
Is our strategy to have vulnerabilities fall into the 5 day list and exploited
vulnerabilities fall
DigiCert votes YES on FORUM-1.
-Tim
From: Public On Behalf Of Bruce Morton via Public
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 10:20 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum
Infrastructure Working Group
Entrust
We’re having a hard time determining the differences between the following:
The CA SHALL revoke a Certificate within 24 hours if:
3. The CA obtains evidence that the Subscriber's Private Key corresponding to
the Public Key in the Certificate suffered a Key Compromise; or
and
The CA
Entrust Datacard votes Yes to FORUM-1.
Bruce.
From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Jos Purvis
(jopurvis) via Public
Sent: August 20, 2018 10:11 AM
To: CA/B Forum Public List
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum
Infrastructure
I didn’t receive any further updates to this ballot by the end of the
discussion period, so the voting period for this ballot is formally opened. It
concludes at 0900 UTC on Monday, 27 August.
Oh, and Cisco votes YES on ballot FORUM-1. :)
--
Jos Purvis (jopur...@cisco.com)
.:|:.:|:.
