Any Pulp2 core or plugin code that you want included in the 2.15.2 release
must be:
a) merged to master by 22:00 UTC, Tuesday Feb 13th
b) be associated with a bugfix issue. stories, refactors, and tasks are not
included in z-stream releases.
This is a new process so send any questions or ideas!
The first one or two releases we do this for, we'll do by hand, but here is
the redmine ticket on the automation to match:
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3348
Can someone groom or comment on it?
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> > Nope, it does not. THe
A few of our models have a field:
created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
To support ordering needed by a FilePlugin use case, I'm planning to add
Content.created as it seems generally useful and I believe will be
needed by most plugins. This raises a more general question: should
+1. Also, wondering if we should add a Model.last_updated field as well.
David
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
> A few of our models have a field:
>
> created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
>
> To support ordering needed by a FilePlugin use
+1 to created and +1 to updated.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 3:52 PM, David Davis wrote:
> +1. Also, wondering if we should add a Model.last_updated field as well.
>
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
>
>> A few of our models
FYI: https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3325
On 02/12/2018 03:01 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote:
+1 to created and +1 to updated.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 3:52 PM, David Davis > wrote:
+1. Also, wondering if we should add a Model.last_updated
You forgot to mention the huge amount of fun, we had while debugging
the designated pulp3 development environment.
But i agree, that focussing on one environment (that fits all,
including core and plugin development) sounds reasonable. And the
vagrant setup with ansible roles sounds like my first