Hi,
I was wondering if there is some way to determine whether or not the task
is completed from a consumer end when it binds to a repo. In terms of
automation, when i bind a consumer, in this case via puppet, i have had to
put a sleep in as there is no real way for me to determine when the task
: Jon Shanks jon.sha...@gmail.com
To: Pulp-list@redhat.com pulp-list@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 12:16:53 PM
Subject: [Pulp-list] quick functionality question about repo metadata
Hi,
I can't tell if there is a bug or if it's a new feature in pulp between
2.4 and 2.5
Ah great, thanks for the information.
I did mean node.js sorry. My next question was about contributing, so that
is great, i'll take a look at the docs and see where i end up.
Thanks
Jon
On 23 October 2014 14:30, Randy Barlow rbar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/23/2014 05:38 AM, Jon Shanks wrote
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way of listing the repos a consumer is bound
to as to not bind to repo's it's already part of. I am automating the
binding but i need a way of returning what it's already bound to to know
that it isn't part of it already. However, the only thing i can see is to
Ah great, but that is something done from an admin role as oppose the
consumer itself being aware of the repos it has bound too?
On 24 October 2014 19:13, Randy Barlow rbar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/24/2014 12:23 PM, Jon Shanks wrote:
I was wondering if there is a way of listing the repos
Hi,
I was just wondering if there is a roadmap for pulp? I checked
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/roadmap but get an error.
I am more wondering to what extent the different repo types will extend.
There is docker, puppet as well as rpm, will there be node support as well
in the future maybe?
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way to set the metacache expiration time for
a repository on a consumer, like you can with yum. And also, how many
features are available that are yum configuration orientated, that can be
implemented via pulp.
As pulp is responsible for creating the repo, is it
